Teams' female representation and perceived potency as inputs to team outcomes in a predominantly male field setting

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 893-924

  Hirschfeld, Robert R ^a   Jordan, Mark H ^b   Feild, Hubert S ^c   Giles, William F ^c   Armenakis, Achilles A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY   (United States)

^c AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344477014     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00892.x     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Anderson J, Gerbing D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
2. Arvey RD, Landon TE, Nutting SM, Maxwell SE. (1992). Development of physical ability tests for police officers: A construct validation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 996-1009.
3. Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
4. Bandura A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. American Psychologist, 52, 1-26.
5. Bargh JA. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In Chaiken S, Trope Y (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York: Guilford.
6. Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
7. Barry B, Stewart GL. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
8. Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.
9. Biernat M, Kobrynowicz D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544-557.
10. Bliese PD. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Bobko P. (1995). Correlation and regression: Principles and applications for industrial/organizational psychology and management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Boyce LA, Herd AM. (2003). The relationship between gender role stereotypes and requisite military leadership characteristics. Sex Roles, 49, 365-378.
13. Browne MW, Cudeck R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen KA, Long JS (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Buss DM. (1997). Evolutionary foundations of personality. In Hogan R, Johnson I, Riggs S (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 317-344). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Campion MA, Medsker GJ, Higgs AC. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 46, 823-850.
16. Campion MA, Papper EM, Medsker GJ. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 49, 429-452.
17. Carli LL, Eagly AH. (1999). Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In Powell GN (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 203-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Chatman JA, O'Reilly CA. (2004). Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 193-208.
19. Chattopadhyay P, Tluchowska M, George E. (2004). Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review, 29, 180-202.
20. Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375-395.
21. Chen G, Gully SM, Whiteman J, Kilcullen RN. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835-847.
22. Clegg CW, Wall TD, Pepper K, Stride C, Woods D, Morrison D, et al. (2002). An international survey of the use and effectiveness of modern manufacturing practices. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 12, 171-191.
23. Cleveland JN, Stockdale M, Murphy KR. (2000). Women and men in organizations: Sex and gender issues at work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Cohen SO, Bailey DE. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
25. Cook TD, Campbell DT. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Corderly J. (2003). Team work. In Holman D, Wall TD, Clegg CW, Sparrow P, Howard A (Eds.), The new workplace: A guide to the human impact of modern working practices (pp. 95-114). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27. Eagly AH, Wood W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315.
28. Eden D. (2002). Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841-846.
29. rd ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
30. Foschi M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 237-254.
31. Frink DD, Robinson RK, Reithel B, Arthur MM, Ammeter AP, Ferris GR, et al. (2003). Gender demography and organization performance: A two-study investigation with convergence. Group and Organization Management, 28, 127-147.
32. Frone MR, Russell M, Cooper ML. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65-78.
33. Gellatly IR. (1996). Conscientiousness and task performance: Test of a cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 474-482.
34. Gibson CB. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
35. Gibson CB, Randel AE, Earley PC. (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group and Organization Management, 21, 67-97.
36. Goldberg CB, Finkelstein LM, Perry EL, Konrad AM. (2004). Job and industry fit: The effects of age and gender matches on career progress outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 807-829.
37. Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubein JM. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
38. Guzzo RA, Yost PR, Campbell RJ, Shea GP. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
39. Haaland S, Christiansen ND. (2002). Implications of trait-activation theory for evaluating the construct validity of assessment center ratings. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 55, 137-163.
40. Hackman JR. (1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch JW (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 376-389). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Hackman JR, Wageman R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269-287.
42. Halpem DF. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091-1102.
43. Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
44. Heilman MA, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed in male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.
45. Howard A. (1995). A framework for work change. In Howard A (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 3-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Ilgen DR. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist, 54, 129-139.
47. Ilgen DR, Sheppard L. (2001). Motivation in work teams. InErez M, Kleinbeck U, Thierry H (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 169-179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
49. James LB, Demaree RG, Wolf G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
50. Jensen AR. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
51. Jung DI, Sosik JJ. (2003). Group potency and collective efficacy: Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance. Group and Organization Management, 28, 366-391.
52. Kanter RM. (1977a). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
53. Kanter RM. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
54. Karakowsky L, Siegel JP. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631.
55. Kirkman BL, Rosen B. (2000). Powering up teams. Organizational Dynamics, 28, 48-65.
56. Kirkman BL, Tesluk PE, Rosen B. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual-level data in predicting team effectiveness. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 54, 645-667.
57. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236.
58. Konrad AM. (2003). Defining the domain of workplace diversity scholarship. Group and Organization Management, 28, 4-17.
59. Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman WC, Ilgen DR (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
60. LePine JA, Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR, Colquitt JA, Ellis A. (2002). Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 445-475.
61. Lester SW, Meglino BM, Korsgaard MA. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
62. Levi D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Linn RL. (1968). Range restriction problems in the use of self-selected groups for test validation. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 69-73.
64. Lykken DT. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.
65. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. (2001). A conceptual framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
66. Marks MA, Zaccaro SJ, Mathieu JE. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971-986.
67. Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
68. McIntyre RM, Salas R. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In Guzzo RA, Salas E, Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. Meeker BF, Weitzel-O'Neill PA. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Reviw, 42, 91-105.
70. Milliken FJ, Martins LL. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
71. Mohrman SA. (2003). Designing work for knowledge-based competition. In Jackson SE, Hitt MA, DeNisi AS (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (pp. 94-123). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Mulaik SA, James LR, Alstine JV, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
73. Mullen B, Copper C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
74. Netemeyer RG, Johnston MW, Burton S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 148-157.
75. O'Reilly CA, Pfeffer J. (2000). Hidden value: How great companies achieve extraordinary results with ordinary people. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
76. Osterman P. (2000). Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 179-196.
77. Pearce CL, Gallagher CA, Ensley MD. (2002). Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 115-119.
78. Perry EL, Davis-Blake A, Kulik CT. (1994). Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Academy of Management Review, 19, 786-820.
79. rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. Pratto F, Stallworth LM, Sidanius J, Siers B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53.
81. Rosen LN, Bliese PD, Wright KA, Gifford RK. (1999). Gender composition and group cohesion in U.S. army units: A comparison across five studies. Armed Forces and Society, 25, 365-386.
82. Sackett PR, Wilk SL. (1994). Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist, 49, 929-954.
83. Seers A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118-135.
84. Shea GP, Guzzo RA. (1987). Groups as human resources. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, 323-356.
85. Simons TL, Peterson RS. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
86. Stewart GL, Manz CC, Sims HP, Jr. (1999). Team work and group dynamics. New York: Wiley.
87. Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
88. Taggar S, Seijts GH. (2003). Leader and staff role-efficacy as antecedents of collective-efficacy and team performance. Human Performance, 16, 131-156.
89. Tesluk P, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ, Marks M. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 107-224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW. (2004). When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1585-1598.
91. Wageman R. (2001). The meaning of interdependence. In Turner ME (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 197-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Webber SS, Donahue LM. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
93. Wood W. (1987). Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 53-71.
94. Wood W, Karten SJ. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341-347.