Interpersonal PSI: Exploring the role of the sender in ganzfeld gesp tasks

Journal of Parapsychology

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 361-380

  Roe, Chris A ^a   Sherwood, Simon J ^a   Holt, Nicola J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344476388     PISSN: 00223387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BATCHELDOR, K.J. (1966). Report on a case of table levitation and associated phenomena. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 43, 339-356.
2. BELOFF, J. (1969). The "sweethearts" experiment. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 45, 1-7.
3. BELOFF, J. (1993). Parapsychology: A concise history. London: The Athlone Press.
4. BEM, D.J., & HONORTON, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.
5. BENDER, H. (1970). Differential scoring of outstanding subject on GESP and clairvoyance. Journal of Parapsychology, 34, 272-273.
6. BIRGE, W.R., & RHINE, J.B. (1942). Unusual types of persons tested for ESP: I. A professional medium. Journal of Parapsychology, 6, 85-94.
7. BROUGHTON, R.S., KANTHAMANI, H., & KHILJI, A. (1989). Assessing the PRL success model on an independent ganzfeld database. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 32nd Annual Convention, 26-33.
8. CARPENTER, J.C. (1977). Intrasubject and subject-agent effects in ESP experiments. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 202-272). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
9. DALTON, K. (1997). Exploring the links: Creativity and psi in the ganzfeld. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 40th Annual Convention, 19-134.
10. DUNNE, B.J., WARNOCK, E., & BISAHA, J.P. (1977). Ganzfeld techniques with independent ratings for measuring GESP and precognition [Abstract]. In J.D. Morris, W.G. Roll. & R.L. Morris (Eds.) Research in Parapsychology 1976 (pp. 41-43). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
11. EYSENCK, S.B.G., EYSENCK, H.J., & BARRETT, P. (1985). A revised version of the Psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
12. EYSENCK, H.J., & SARGENT, C. (1993). Explaining the unexplained: Mysteries of the paranormal. London: PRION.
13. th Annual Convention, 132-140.
14. HONORTON, C., BERGER, R. VARVOGLIS, M., QUANT, M., DERR, P., SCHECHTER, E., & FERRARI, D. (1990). Psi communication in the ganzfeld: Experiments with an automated testing system and a comparison with a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Journal of Parapsychology, 54, 99-139.
15. HONORTON, C., FERRARI, D., & BEM, D. (1998). Extraversion and free response performance: A meta-analysis and a new confirmation. Journal of Parapsychology, 62, 277-282.
16. rd ed.). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
17. KANTHAMANI, H., & PALMER, J. (1993). A ganzfeld experiment with "subliminal sending." Journal of Parapsychology, 57, 241-257.
18. th Annual Convention, 71-72.
19. KLINE, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
20. KREITLER, H. & KREITLER, S. (1972). Does extrasensory perception affect psychological experiments? Journal of Parapsychology, 36, 1-45.
21. KREITLER, H. & KREITLER, S. (1973). Subliminal perception and extrasensory perception. Journal of Parapsychology, 37, 163-188.
22. LANGDON-DAVIES, J. (1956) .What is the agent's role in ESP? Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 38, 329-337.
23. LANTZ, N.D., LUKE, W.L.W., & MAY, E.C. (1994). Target and sender dependencies in anomalous cognition experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 285-302.
24. LAWRENCE, T.R. (1993). Gathering in the sheep and goats: A meta-analysis of forced-choice sheep-goat studies, 1947-1993. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 36th Annual Convention, 75-86.
25. MILTON, J. (1988-9). A possible "directive" role of the agent in the ganzfeld. European Journal of Parapsychology, 7, 193-214.
26. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (1999). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 387-391.
27. MORRIS. R.L., CUNNINGHAM, S., MCALPINE, S., & TAYLOR, R. (1993). Toward replication and extension of autoganzfeld results. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 36th Annual Convention, 177-191.
28. MORRIS. R.L., DALTON, K., DELANOY, D.L., & WATT, C. (1995). Comparison of the sender/no sender condition in the ganzfeld. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 38th Annual Convention, 244-259.
29. PALMER, J. (1977). Attitudes and personality traits in experimental ESP research. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.) Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 175-201). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
30. PALMER, J. (1978). Extrasensory perception: Research findings. In S. Krippner (Ed.) Advances in parapsychological research 2: Extrasensory perception (pp. 59-243). New York: Plenum Press.
31. PALMER, J. (1997). Correlates of ESP magnitude and direction in the PRL and RRC autoganzfeld data bases Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 40th Annual Convention, 283-298.
32. PALMER, J. (1997, November). The psychology of ESP: Magnitude vs. direction. Paper presented at the First International Brazilian Congress of Parapsychology, Recife, Brazil.
33. PARKER, A., GRAMS, D., & PETTERSSON, C. (1998). Further variables relating to psi in the Ganzfeld. Journal of Parapsychology, 62, 319-337.
34. RABURN, L., & MANNING, R. (1977). Sender relaxation and expectation in telepathy [Abstract]. In J.D. Morris, W.G. Roll, &R.L. Morris (Eds.) Research in Parapsychology 1976 (pp. 156-158). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
35. ROE, C.A., ALI, A.N., & MCKENZIE, E.A. (2001). Sender and receiver creativity scores as predictors of performance at a ganzfeld ESP task. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 65, 107-121.
36. ROE, C.A., DAVEY, R., & STEVENS, P. (2002). Are ESP and PK aspects of a unitary phenomenon? A preliminary test of the relationship between ESP and PK. Journal of Parapsychology, 67, 343-366.
37. ROE, C. A., & SHERWOOD, S. J. (2001). Revisiting the role of the sender using a ganzfeld psi task. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 44th Annual Convention, 415-418.
38. ROE, C.A., SHERWOOD, S.J., LUKE, D.P., & FARRELL, L.M. (2002). An exploratory investigation of dream GESP using consensus judging and dynamic targets, Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 66, 225-238.
39. SCHLITZ, M.J., & HONORTON, C. (1992). Ganzfeld performance within an artistically gifted population. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 86, 93-98.
40. SCHMEIDLER, G.R. (1961). Evidence for two kinds of telepathy. International Journal of Parapsychology, 3, 5-48.
41. THALBOURNE, M.A., & DELIN, P.S. (1993). A new instrument for measuring the sheep-goat variable: Its psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 59, 172-186.
42. WEST, D.J. (1950). ESP performance and the expansion-compression rating. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 35, 295-308.
43. WILLIAMS, C., ROE, C.A., UPCHURCH, I., & LAWRENCE, T.R. (1994). Senders and geomagnetism in the autoganzfeld. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 37th Annual Convention, 429-438.