Capture by misleading information and its false acceptance in patients with traumatic brain injury

Brain

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 128-140

  Dockree, Paul M ^a   O'Keeffe, Fiadhnait M ^a   Moloney, Pauline ^a   Bishara, Anthony J ^c   Carton, Simone ^b   Jacoby, Larry L ^c   Robertson, Ian H ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b The National Rehabilitation Hospital   (Ireland)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capture; False memory; Misinformation; Prefrontal cortices; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSAULT; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FALLING; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MALE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECALL; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CUES; DECEPTION; FEMALE; FINGERS; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

EID: 30344475207     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh664     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bunge SA, Ochsner KN, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind. Brain 2001; 124: 2074-86.
2. Burgess PW, Shallice T. Confabulation and the control of recollection. Memory 1996; 4: 359-411.
3. Burgess PW, Scott SK, Frith CD. The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 906-18.
4. Damasio AR. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996; 351: 1413-20.
5. Delbecq-Derouesne J, Beauvois MF, Shallice T. Preserved recall versus impaired recognition. A case study. Brain 1990; 113: 1045-74.
6. Donaldson W. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Mem Cognit 1996; 24: 523-33.
7. Duncan J. Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. In: Gazzainiga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995. p. 721-33.
8. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, Richardson SL, Guynn MJ, Cunfer AR. Aging and prospective memory: examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1995; 21: 996-1007.
9. Einstein GO, Smith RE, McDaniel MA, Shaw P. Aging and prospective memory: the influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval. Psychol Aging 1997; 12: 479-88.
10. Fletcher PC, Frith CD, Rugg MD. The functional neuroanatomy of episodic memory. Trends Neurosci 1997; 20: 213-8.
11. Fuster JM. The prefrontal cortex: anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. New York: Raven Press; 1989.
12. Gardiner JM, Java RI. Recognizing and remembering. In: Collins A, Gathercole S, Conway M, Morris P, editors. Theories of memory. NJ: Erlbaum; 1993. p. 163-88.
13. Goldman-Rakic PS. Curcuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In: Plum F, editor. Handbook of physiology: the nervous system. Bethesda: American Physiological Society; 1987. p. 373-417.
14. Hasher L, Zacks RT. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH, editor. The psychology of learing and motivation: advances in research and theory. Vol. 22. San Diego: Academic Press; 1988. p. 193-225.
15. Jacoby LL. Deceiving the elderly: effects of accessibility bias in cued-recall performance. Cognit Neuropsychol 1999; 16: 417-36.
16. Jacoby LL, Jennings JM, Hay JF. Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled processes: implications for diagnosis and rehabilitation of memory deficits. In: Herrmann DJ, McEvoy CL, Hertzog C, Hertel P, Johnson MK, editors. Basic and applied memory research: theory in context. Vol. 1. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1996. p. 161-93.
17. Jacoby LL, Bishara AJ, Hessels S, Toth JP. Aging, subjective experience, and cognitive control: dramatic false remembering by older adults. J Exp Psychol Gen 2005; 134: 131-48.
18. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. Source monitoring. Psychol Bull 1993; 114: 3-28.
19. Leahy BJ, Lam CS. Neuropsychological testing and functional outcome for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1998; 12: 1025-35.
20. Lehrer PM, Groveman A, Randolph C, Miller MH, Pollack I. Physiological response patterns to cognitive testing in adults with closed head injuries. Psychophysiology 1989; 26: 668-75.
21. Lepage M, Ghaffar O, Nyberg L, Tulving E. Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 506-11.
22. Levine B, Dawson D, Boutet I, Schwartz ML, Stuss DT. Assessment of strategic self-regulation in traumatic brain injury: its relationship to injury severity and psychosocial outcome. Neuropsychology 2000; 14: 491-500.
23. MacLeod CM. The Stroop task: The 'gold standard' of attentional measures. J Exp Psychol Gen 1992; 121: 12-14.
24. Mandler G. Memory: conscious and unconscious. In: Goethals GR, Kelly CM, Stephens BR, editors. Memory: interdisciplinary approaches. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989. p. 84-106.
25. Mattson AJ, Levin HS. Frontal lobe dysfunction following closed head injury: a review of the literature. J Nervous Mental Dis 1990; 178: 282-91.
26. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory 1993; 1: 23-41.
27. Morrow L, Vrtunski PB, Kim Y, Boller F. Arousal responses to emotional stimuli and laterality of lesion. Neuropsychologia 1981; 19: 65-71.
28. Moscovitch M. Memory and working-with-memory: a component process model based on modules and central systems. J Cogn Neurosci 1992; 4: 257-67.
29. Norman KA, Schacter DL. Implicit memory, explicit memory, and false recollection: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In: Reder LM, editor. Implicit memory and metacognition. NJ: Erlbaum; 1996. p. 229-59.
30. O'Connell RG, Bellgrove MA, Dockree PM, Robertson IH. Reduced electrodermal response to errors predicts poor sustained attention performance in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuroreport 2004; 15: 2535-8.
31. O'Keeffe FM, Dockree PM, Robertson IH. Poor insight in traumatic brain injury mediated by impaired error processing? Evidence from electrodermal activity. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 22: 101-12.
32. Parkin AJ, Bindschaedler C, Harsent L, Metzler C. Pathological false alarm rates following damage to the left frontal cortex. Brain Cogn 1996; 32: 14-27.
33. Richardson JTE. Clinical and neuropsychological aspects of closed head injury. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd; 2000.
34. Rios M, Perianez JA, Munoz-Cespedes JM. Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2004; 18: 257-72.
35. Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The structure of normal human attention: the test of everyday attention. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1996; 2: 525-34.
36. Schacter DL, Buckner RL, Koutstaal W, Dale AM, Rosen BR. Late onset of anterior prefrontal activity during true and false recognition: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 1997; 6: 259-69.
37. Schacter DL, Norman KA, Koutstaal W. The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annu Rev Psychol 1998; 49: 289-318.
38. Shimanura AP. Memory and frontal lobe function. In: Gazzainiga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995. p. 803-13.
39. Spreen O, Strauss EA. Compendium of neuropsychological tests. Administration, norms and commentary. New York: Oxford Univerity Press; 1998.
40. Stern R, Ray WJ, Quigley KS. Psychophysiological recordings. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
41. Stuss DT, Floden D, Alexander MP, Levine B, Katz D. Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 771-86.
42. Thorndike EL, Lorge I. The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Columbia University; 1944.
43. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Can Psychol 1985; 26: 1-12.
44. Walker D. Remembrance of things future: involuntary and strategic processes in prospective memory reminders. Reading, UK: University of Reading; 2003.
45. Wallace JC, Kass SJ, Stanny CJ. The cognitive failures questionnaire revisited: dimensions and correlates. J Gen Psychol 2002; 129: 238-56.
46. Wechsler D, Wycherly R. Wechsler memory scale-111. London: The Psychological Corporation Limited; 1998.
47. West RL. An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol Bull 1996; 120: 272-92.
48. Zahn TP, Mirsky AF. Autonomic activity during task performance in adults with closed head injury. Int J Psychophysiol 1999; 33: 113-26.
49. Zahn TP, Grafman J, Tranel D. Frontal lobe lesions and electrodermal activity: effects of significance. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 1227-41.
50. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-70.
51. Zimmer H. Frequency and mean amplitude of spontaneous electrodermal fluctuations are not interchangeable indicators of psychological processes. Z Exp Psychol 2000; 47: 129-43.
52. Zoccolotti P, Scabini D, Violani C. Electrodermal responses in patients with unilateral brain damage. J Clin Neuropsychol 1982; 4: 143-50.