Response to Newmeyer's 'Grammar is grammar and usage is usage'

Language

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 226-228

  Meyer, Charles F ^a   Tao, Hongyin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344460293     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2005.0032     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. COWART, WAYNE. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. MANNING, CHRISTOPHER D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. Probabilistic linguistics, ed. by Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy, 289-341. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. MORGAN, JERRY L. 1972. Verb agreement as a rule of English. Chicago Linguistic Society 8.278-86.
5. NEWMEYER, FREDERICK. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79.682-707.
6. POLLARD, CARL, and IVAN A. SAG. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. SCHÜTZE, CARSON T. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. SNOW, CATHERINE, and GUUS MEIJER. 1977. On the secondary nature of syntactic intuitions. Acceptability in language, ed. by Sidney Greenbaum, 163-77. The Hague: Mouton.