Recommendations for a toxicological screening ERG procedure in laboratory animals

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-66

  Rosolen, Serge G ^a,b   Rigaudière, Florence ^b   Le Gargasson, Jean François ^b   Brigell, Mitchell G ^c  

^a CLINIQUE VÉTÉRINAIRE   (France)

^b HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

^c PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal models; Electroretinogram; Retina; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; CHEMICAL AGENT;

DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; EYE TOXICITY; NIGHT VISION; NONHUMAN; PHOTOPIC VISION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RETINA DISEASE; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TECHNIQUE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RETINA; RETINAL DISEASES; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 30344458780     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-005-7344-y     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Bayer AU, Cook P, Brodie SE, et al. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash eletroretinography in rodents. Vis Res 2001; 41: 2173-2185. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00103-1 11448710
2. Marmor MF, Holder GE, Seeliger MW, Yamamoto S. Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2004 108: 107-114. 10.1023/B:DOOP.0000036793.44912.45 15455793
3. Brigell M, Bach M, Barber C, Moskowitz A, Robson J. Guidelines for calibration of stimulus and recording parameters used in clinical electrophysiology of vision. Doc Ophthalmol 2003; 107: 185-193. 10.1023/ A:1026244901657 14661909
4. Narfstrom K, Ekesten B, Rosolen SG, et al. Guidelines for clinical electroretinography in the dog. Doc Ophthamol 2002; 105: 83-92. 10.1023/ A:1020524305726
5. Ahnelt PK, Kolb H. The mammalian photoreceptor mosaic-adaptative design. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19: 711-777. 10.1016/S1350-9462(00)00012-4 11029553
6. Jacobs GH. The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev 1993; 68: 413-471. 10.1086/418174 8347768
7. Wu J, Marmorstein AD, Kofuji P, Peachey NS. Contribution of Kir4.1 to the mouse electroretinogram. Mol Vis 2004; 10: 650-654. 15359216
8. Aylward GM. A simple method of fitting the Naka-Rushton equation. Clin Vis Sci 1989; 4: 275-277.
9. Rufiange M, Rousseau S, Dembinska O, Lachapelle P. Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: The Photopic Hill revisited. Doc Ophthamol 2002; 104: 231-248. 10.1023/A:1015265812018
10. Wali N, Leguire LE. On the method for fitting the Naka-Rushton equation: corrections to Aylaward (1989). Clin Vis Sci 1990 6: 79.
11. Hébert M, Lachapelle P, Dulmont M. Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes. Doc Ophthamol 1996; 91: 333-342. 10.1007/BF01214651
12. Kondo M, Sieving PA. Primate photopic sine-wave flicker ERG: Vector modelling analysis of component origins using glutamate analogs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 305-312. 11133883
13. Krishna VR, Alexander KR, Peachey NS. Temporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol 2002; 87: 42-48. 11784728
14. Chaudhary V, Hansen R, Lindgren H, Fulton A. Effects of telazol and Nembutal on retinal responses. Doc Ophthalmol 2003; 107: 45-51. 10.1023/ A:1024444113700 12906121
15. Tremblay F, Parkinson JE. Alteration of electroretinographic recordings when performed under sedation or halogenate anaesthesia in a pediatric population. Doc Ophthalmol 2003; 107: 271-279. 10.1023/ B:DOOP.0000005336.08147.fc 14711159
16. Kong J, Gouras P. The effect of body temperature on the murine electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 2003; 106: 239-242. 10.1023/ A:1022988332578 12737500
17. Goto Y. An electrode to record the mouse cornea electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1995-96; 91: 147-154. 10.1007/BF01203694
18. Sagdullaev BT, DeMarco PJ, McCall MA. Improved contact lens electrode for corneal ERG recordings in mice. Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108: 181-184. 10.1007/s10633-004-5734-1 15573941