Experientialist epistemology and classification theory: Embodied and dimensional classification

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 79-92

  Tennis, Joseph T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b School of Library Archival and Information Studies ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344457884     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Albrechtsen, H. and Pejtersen, A. M. 2003. Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes. In Knowledge organization 30:213-27.
2. Bates, M. J. 1998. Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49: 1185-1205.
3. Beghtol, C. 2002. Universal concepts, cultural warrant, and cultural hospitality. In Lopez-Huertas, M. J. ed. Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: integration of knowledge across boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Advances in knowledge organization, vol. 8. Würzburg: Ergon, pp. 45-49.
4. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. 1967. Social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
5. Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. 1999. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Flickr. 2005. Available: http://www.flickr.com/
7. Frauenfelder, M. 2001. A smarter web. Technology Review November. Available: http://www.cognit.com/home_multi/html/ Technology_Review_Frauenfelderall.pdf
8. Gruber T. R. 1993. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In Guarino, N. and Poli, R. eds., Formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Available: http://citeseer.ist.psu.du/gruber93toward.html
9. Hjørland, B. 2002. Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation. 58:422-62.
10. Jacob, E. K. 2001. The everyday world of work: Two approaches to the investigation of classification in context. Journal of documentation 57:76-99.
11. Jacob, E. K. and Albrechtsen, H. 1999. "When essence becomes function: post-structuralist implications for an ecological theory of organisational classification systems." In Wilson, T.D. and Allen, D.K. eds., Exploring the contexts of information behaviour, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. pp. 519-34.
12. Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
13. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Maedche, A, Mortik, B., Silva,N., and Volz, R. 2002. MAFRA: a MApping FRAmework for distributed ontologies. Available: http://sra.itc.it/people/ agostini/RA/WSeminars/material/Dellerba11Dec02/Mafra.pdf
17. Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. 1998. The concept of 'Ba': Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California management review 40n3:40-54.
18. Noy, N. F., and Musen, M. A. 2002. Anchor-PROMPT: using non-local context for semantic matching. Available: http://www-smi.stanford.edu/pubs/SMI_Reports/ SMI-2001-0889.pdf
19. Olson, Hope A. 2002. The Power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in libraries, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20. Pejtersen, A.M., Albrechtsen, H., Cleal, B., Hansen, C.B., and Hertzum, M. A. 2001. Web-based multimedia collaboratory. Empirical work studies in film archives. Risø-R-1284(EN) (CHMI-02-01).
21. Priss, U. 2002. Associative and formal concepts. In Priss, U., Corbett and Angelova eds., Conceptual structures: integration and interfaces, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, pp. 354-68. Available: http://www.upriss.org.uk/ papers/iccs02.pdf
22. Priss, U. 2001. Multilevel approaches to concepts and formal ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 12th ASIST SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, pp. 53-66. Available: http://www.upriss.org.uk/papers/sigcr01.pdf
23. Ranganathan, S. R. 1967. Prolegomena to library classification, 3rd ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
24. Semantic Grid. 2005. www.semanticgrid.org
25. Snowden, D. 2001. Complex acts of knowing - paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Paper available: http://www-1.ibm.com/services/files/complex.pdf
26. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science 19:387-420.
27. Tennis, J. T. 2002. Subject ontogeny: subject access through time and the dimensionality of classification. In Lopez-Huertas, Maria J., ed. Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: integration of knowledge across boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Advances in knowledge organization, vol. 8. Würzburg: Ergon.
28. Verity. 2002. Verity.K2 Enterprise Technical Overview. Available: http://www.quiver.com/products/k2_enterprise/pdf/MK0385a_K2E_TechOverview.Pdf