Simulation of geographical trends in the Chowdhury ecosystem model

Advances in Complex Systems

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 451-464

  Rohde, Klaus ^a   Stauffer, Dietrich ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Latitudinal gradient; Productivity; Species diversity

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344456680     PISSN: 02195259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021952590500052X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chowdhury, D., Stauffer, D. and Kunwar, A., Unification of small and large time scales for biological evolution: Deviations from power law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 068101 (2003);
2. Chowdhury, D. and Stauffer, D., Food-web-based unified model of macro- and microevolution, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041901 (2003).
3. Chowdhury, D. and Stauffer, D., Evolutionary ecology in-silico: Does mathematical modelling help in understanding the "generic" trends? J. Biosci. (India) 30, 277-287 (2005).
4. Crame, J. A., Taxonomic diversity gradients through geological time, Diversity Distributions 7, 175-189 (2001).
5. Hector, A., The effect of diversity on productivity detecting the role of species complementarity, Oikos 82, 597-599 (1998).
6. Jablonski, D., The tropics as a source of evolutionary novelty through geological time, Nature 364, 142-144 (1993).
7. Jablonski, D., The future of the fossil record, Science 284, 2114-2116 (1999).
8. Kareiva, P., Diversity begets productivity, Nature 368, 686-687 (1994).
9. Kunwar, A., Evolution of spatially inhomogeneous eco-systems: A unified model based approach, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 1449-1460 (2004).
10. Likens, G. E., Primary production of inland ecosystems, in Primary Productivity in the Biosphere, eds. Lieth, H. and Whittaker, R. H. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1975), pp. 185-202.
11. Myers, N., The niche diversity of biodiversity issues, in Biodiversity II. Understanding and Perfecting Our Biological Resources, eds. Reaka-Kudla, M. L., Wilson, D. E. and Wilson, E. U. (Joseph Henry Press, Washington, 1997), pp. 125-138.
12. Pielou, C., Biogeography (Wiley, New York, 1979).
13. Planka, E. E., Evolutionary Ecology, 3rd edn. (Harper and Sons, New York, 1983).
14. Rohde, K., Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and their causes: II. Marine parasitological evidence for a time hypothesis, Biologisches Zentrulblatt 97, 405-418 (1978).
15. Rohde, K., Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: The search for the primary cause, Oikos 65, 514-527 (1992).
16. Rohde, K., Ecology of Marine Parasites, 2nd edn. (CAB - International, Wallingford, Oxon, U.K., 1993)
17. Rohde, K., Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: Area matters, but how much? Oikos 82, 184-190 (1998).
18. Rohde, K., Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and Rapoport's rule revisited: A review of recent work, and what can parasites teach us about the causes of the gradients? Ecography 22, 593-613 (1999).
19. Rohde, K., Nonequilibrium Ecology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
20. Sideleva, V. G., The Endemic Fishes of Lake Baikal (Backhuys Publ., Leiden, 1999).
21. Stauffer, D. and Chowdhury, D., Evolutionary ecology in-silico: Evolving foodwebs, migrating population and speciation, Physica A 352, 202-215 (2005).
22. Stehli, F. G., Douglas, D. G. and Newell, N. D., Generation and maintenance of gradients in taxonomic diversity, Science 164, 947-949 (1969).
23. Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Steiner, C. F., Mittelbach, G. G., Gough, L., Dodson, S. I., Juday, G. P. and Parmenter, R., The relationship between productivity and species richness, Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 30, 257-300 (1999).
24. Wetzel, R. G., Limnology (Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1975).
25. Willig, M. R., Latitude, common trends within, in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Vol. 3, ed. Levin, S. (Academic Press, N.Y., 2001), pp. 701-714.