The English Question

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 37-56

  Hazell, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344450801     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjj012     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Adams, J., and J. Tomaney. 2002. Restoring the balance: Strengthening the government's proposals for regional assemblies. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
2. Cole, G. D. H. 1947. Local and regional government. London: Cassell.
3. Commission for Local Democracy. 1995. Taking charge: The rebirth of local democracy. London: Commission for Local Democracy.
4. Crick, B. 1991. The English and the British. In National identities: The constitution of the United Kingdom, ed. B. Crick, 90-104. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Curtice, J. 2001. Hopes dashed and fears assuaged? What the public makes of it so far. In The state of the nations 2001, ed. A. Trench, 90-104. Exeter, U.K.: Imprint Academic.
6. _. 2006. A stronger or weaker union? Public reactions to asymmetric devolution in the United Kingdom. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36 (1): 95-114.
7. _. Forthcoming. What the people say, if anything. In The English Question, ed. R. Hazell, 119-139. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
8. Curtice, J., and A. Heath. 2000. Is the English lion about to roar? National identity after devolution. In British social attitudes: The 17th report, ed. Roger Jowell, John Curtice, Alison Park, Katarina Thomson, Lindsey Jarvis, Catherine Bromley, and Nina Stratford, 155-174 London: Sage.
9. Fawcett, C. B. 1919. Provinces of England: A study of some geographical aspects of devolution. The Making of the Future Series. London: Williams and Norgate.
10. Hadfield, B. 2005. Devolution, Westminster and the English Question. Public Law Summer: 286-305.
11. Harding, A. 2000. Is there a missing middle in English governance? London: New Local Government Network.
12. Hazell, R. 2000. An unstable union: Devolution and the English Question. London: Constitution Unit.
13. _. 2001. The English Question: Can Westminster be a proxy for an English parliament? Public Law Summer: 268-280.
14. _. 2005. Westminster as a three-in-one legislature. In Devolution, law making and the constitution, ed. R. Hazell and R. Rawlings, 226-251. Exeter, U.K.: Imprint Academic.
15. House of Lords Select Committee on Central-Local Relations. 1996. Rebuilding trust. London: Stationery Office.
16. Jeffery, C. 2005. Before the referendum: Public views on elected regional assemblies in the North of England. ESRC Devolution and Constitutional Change Briefing 17. http://www.devolution.ac.uk.
17. Keating, M. Forthcoming. From functional to political regionalism: England in comparative perspective. In The English Question, ed. R. Hazell, 142-157. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18. Labour Party. 2005. Manifesto: Britain forward, not back. London: Labour Party.
19. Local Government Association. 2004. Independence, opportunity, trust: A manifesto for local communities. London: LG Connect.
20. Local Government Information Unit. 2002. Free to differ: The future of local democracy. London: Local Government Information Unit.
21. Pearce, G., and S. Ayres. 2005. Decentralisation in the English regions: Assessing the implications for rural and transport policy. ESRC Devolution and Constitutional Change Briefing 16. http://www.devolution.ac.uk.
22. Rallings, C., and M. Thrasher. 2005. Why the North East said no: The 2004 referendum on an elected regional assembly. ESRC Devolution and Constitutional Change Briefing 19. http://www.devolution.ac.uk.
23. Russell, M., and G. Lodge. Forthcoming, The government of England by Westminster. In The English Question, ed. R. Hazell, 64-95. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
24. Sandford, M. 2001. Further steps for regional chambers. London: Constitution Unit.
25. _. 2002. A commentary on the regional government white paper, "Your region, your choice." London: Constitution Unit.
26. _. 2005a. Devolution is a process not a policy: The new governance of the English regions. ESRC Devolution and Constitutional Change Briefing 18. http://www.devolution.ac.uk.
27. _. 2005b. The regional watermark: Why a solution without a problem became a functioning policy in England. Paper presented to the Political Studies Association annual conference, Leeds, April.
28. _. Forthcoming. Facts on the ground: The growth of institutional answers to the English Question in the regions. In The English Question, ed. R. Hazell, 174-193. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
29. Stoker, G. 2000. Is regional government the answer to the English Question? In The English Question, ed. T. Wright and S. Chen, 63-79. London: Fabian Society.
30. _. 2005. What is local government for? Refocusing local governance to meet the challenges of the 21st century. London: New Local Government Network.
31. Tomaney, J. Forthcoming. The idea of English regionalism. In The English Question, ed. R. Hazell, 158-173. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
32. Wyn Jones, R., and R. Scully. 2006. Devolution and electoral politics in Scotland and Wales. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36 (1): 115-134.