From the Field: Implementing recovery of the red wolf - Integrating research scientists and managers

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1145-1152

  Stoskopf, Michael K ^a   Beck, Karen ^a   Fazio, Bud B ^b   Fuller, Todd K ^c   Gese, Eric M ^d   Kelly, Brian T ^a,b,e   Knowlton, Frederick F ^d   Murray, Dennis L ^f   Waddell, William ^g   Waits, Lisette ^h  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Red Wolf Recovery Program   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^f TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Canis rufus; Endangered species; Implementation; Recovery; Red wolf

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CANID; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; CANIS LATRANS; CANIS RUFUS;

EID: 30344444787     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[1145:FTFIRO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. ADAMS, J. R., B. T. KELLY, AND L. P. WAITS. 2003. Using faecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Molecular Ecology 12: 2175-2186.
2. CLARK, T. W., AND R. P. READING. 1994. A professional perspective: improving problem solving, communication and effectiveness. Pages 351-370 in T. W. Clark, R. P. Reading, and A. L. Clark, editors. Endangered species recovery: finding the lessons and improving the process. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
3. CLARK, T. W., R. P. READING, AND A. L. CLARK. 1994. Synthesis. Pages 417-431 in T. W. Clark, R. P. Reading, and A. L. Clark, editors. Endangered species recovery: finding the lessons and improving the process. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
4. CLARK, T. W., AND R. WESTRUM. 1989. High-performance teams in wildlife conservation - a species reintroduction and recovery example. Environmental Management 13: 663-670.
5. CROUSE, D. T., L. A. MEHRHOFF, M. J. PARKIN, D. R. ELAM, AND L. Y. CHEN. 2002. Endangered species recovery and the SCB study: a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service perspective. Ecological Applications 12: 719-723.
6. FAZIO, B. B., C. LUCASH, AND A. BEYER. 2004. Red wolf recovery program adaptive work plan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Report. Manteo, North Carolina, USA.
7. GERBER, L. R., AND L. T. HATCH. 2002. Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the US Endangered Species Act. Ecological Applications 12: 668-673.
8. GREWAL, P. J. WILSON, T. K. KUNG, K. SHAMI, M. T. THEBERGE, J. B. THEBERGE, AND B. N. WHITE. 2004. A genetic assessment of the eastern wolf (Canis lycaon) in Algonquin Provincial Park. Journal of Mammalogy 85: 625-632.
9. HENRY, V. G. 1998. Notice of termination of the red wolf reintroduction project in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Federal Register 63: 54151-54153.
10. HENRY, V. G., AND C. F. LUCASH. 2000. Red wolf introduction lessons regarding species restoration. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Wolf Management Series Technical Report No. 12, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
11. KELLY, B. T. 2000. Red wolf recovery program adaptive work plan - FY00-FY02. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Report, Manteo, North Carolina, USA.
12. KELLY, B. T., P. S. MILLER, AND U. S. SEAL, editors. 1999. Population and habitat viability assessment workshop for the red wolf (Canis rufus). Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN), Apple Valley, Minnesota, USA.
13. KITCHEN, A. M., AND F. F. KNOWLTON. 2005. Cross-fostering in coyotes: evaluation of a potential conservation and research tool for canids. Biological Conservation 00: 000-000.
14. Lancia, R. A., C. E. Braun, M. W. Collopy, R. D. Dueser, J. G. Kie, C. J. Martinka, J. D. Nichols, T. D. Nudds, W. R. Porath, and N. G. Tilghman. 1996. ARM! For the future: adaptive management in the wildlife profession. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 436-442.
15. LUNDQUIST, C. J., J. M. DIEHL, E. HARVEY, AND L. W. BOTSFORD. 2002. Factors affecting implementation of recovery plans. Ecological Applications 12: 713-718.
16. MCCARLEY, H. 1962. The taxonomic status of wild Canis (Canidae) in the South Central United States. Southwestern Naturalist 7: 227-235.
17. MCCARLEY, H., AND C. J. CARLEY. 1979. Recent changes in distribution and status of wild red wolves (Canis rufus). United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Report No. 4, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
18. MILLER, C. R., J. R. ADAMS, AND L. P. WAITS. 2003. Pedigree-based assignment tests for reversing coyote (Canis latrans) introgression into the wild red wolf (Canis rufus) population. Molecular Ecology 12: 3287-3301
19. NOWAK, R. M. 2002. The original status of wolves in Eastern North America. Southeastern Naturalist 1: 95-130.
20. PARKER, W. T. 1987. A plan for reestablishing the red wolf on Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, North Carolina. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Wolf Management Series Technical Report No. 1, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
21. PHILLIPS, M. K., V. G. HENRY, AND B. T. KELLY. 2003. Restoration of the red wolf. Pages 272-288 in L. D. Mech and L. Boitani, editors. Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
22. SCOTT J. M., T. H. TEAR, AND L. S. MILLS. 1995. Socioeconomics and the recovery of endangered species: biological assessment in the political world. Conservation Biology 9: 214-216.
23. TEAR T. H., J. M. SCOTT, P. H. HAYWARD, AND B. GRIFFITH. 1993. Status and prospects for success of the ESA: a look at recovery plans. Science 262: 976-977.
24. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1967. 32 FR 4001.
25. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1989. Red Wolf Recovery Plan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
26. KELLY B. T., P. S. MILLER, AND U. S. SEAL. 1999. Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA) for the Red Wolf (Canis rufus). United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
27. WALTERS, C. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan Publishing, New York, New York, USA.
28. WESTRUM, R. 1994. An organizational perspective: designing recovery teams from the inside out. Pages 327-350 in T. W. Clark, R. P. Reading, and A. L. Clark, editors. Endangered species recovery: finding the lessons and improving the process. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
29. WILSON, P. J., S. GREWAL, I. D. LAWFORD, J. N. M. HEAL, A. G. GRANACKI, D. PENNOCK, J. B. THEBERGE, M. T. THEBERGE, D. R. VOIGT, W. WADDELL, R. E. CHAMBERS, P. C. PAQUET, G. GOULET, D. CLUFF, AND B. N. WHITE. 2000. DNA profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence of a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 2156-2166.