Should women with atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, receive reflex human papillomavirus-DNA testing?

Cancer

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 457-460

  Liman, Agnes K ^a   Giampoli, Ellen J ^a   Bonfiglio, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high grade intraepithelial lesion; Liquid based cytology, colposcopy; Reflex human papillomavirus DNA testing

Indexed keywords

VIRUS DNA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS CANNOT EXCLUDE HIGH GRADE SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE; BETHESDA SYSTEM; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLPOSCOPY; COST CONTROL; DIAGNOSTIC KIT; DNA DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LIQUID CULTURE; LOW GRADE INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLEX HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS DNA TESTING; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; VIRUS DETECTION; WART VIRUS;

CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; DNA, VIRAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS, SQUAMOUS CELL; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PILOT PROJECTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 30344440836     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21387     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10-30.
2. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189:12-19.
3. Wright TC Jr., Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2002;287:2120-2129.
4. Sherman ME, Abdul-Karim FW, Berek JS, Powers CN, Sidawy MK, Tabbara SO. Atypical squamous cells. In: Solomon D, Nayar R, editors. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004:67-87.
5. Louro AP, Roberson J, Eltoum A, Chhieng DC. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a follow-up study of conventional and liquid-based preparations in a high-risk population. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:392-397.
6. Schmidt MJ, Ducatman BS. ASC-H: can we do better [abstract]? Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):76A-77A.
7. Selvaggi SM. Reporting of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) on cervical samples: is it significant? Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29:38-41.
8. Alli PM, Ali SZ. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytopathologic characteristics and clinical correlates. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;28:308-312.
9. Hoschar A, Kink I, Dawson AE. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): correlation of morphologic features, reflex HPV testing and biopsy follow-up [abstract]. Acta Cytol 2004;48:671-672.
10. El-Fakharany M, Al-Khafaji E, El-Dean MS. Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H): the new term on the block: a year in review [abstract]. Acta Cytol. 2004;48:672.
11. Roychowdhury M, Setty S, Gulbahce HE, Stelow EB, Kjeldahl K, Pambuccian SE. ASC-H: should we reflex-test for HPV DNA too [abstract]? Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):75A.
12. Wu HH, Allen SL, Kirkpatrick J, Elsheikh TM. High risk HPV DNA by Hybrid Capture II is a useful triage method for women with ASC-H on ThinPrep Pap tests [abstract]. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):80A.
13. Taraif S, Siddiqui MT, West AM, et al. ASC-H: correlation with reflex HC2 HPV DNA test and biopsy findings [abstract]. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):79A.
14. Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1383-1392.
15. Wright TC, Lorincz A, Ferris DG, et al. Reflex human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:962-966.
16. Sheils LA, Wilbur DC. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization. Acta Cytol. 1997;41:1065-1072.
17. Quddus MR, Sung CJ, Steinhoff MM, Lauchlan SB, Singer DB, Hutchinson ML. Atypical squamous metaplastic cells: reproducibility, outcome, and diagnostic features on Thin-Prep Pap test. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2001;93:16-22.
18. Saad R, Kanbour A, Mauser N, Modery J, Dabbs DJ. Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): diagnostic reproducibility, HPV positivity rates and clinical implications [abstract]. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):76A.
19. Joutovsky A, Levine P, Elgert P, Cangiarella J, Simsir A. Atypical squamous cells-cannot rule out high grade SIL: implications for management in postmenopausal and pregnant women [abstract]. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):68A.
20. Srodon M, Dilworth HP, Ronnett BM. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): HPV testing and histologic results [abstract]. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(S1):78A.