Re-engineering letter-to-sound rules

2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Jansche, Martin ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATA THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

FINITE-STATE AUTOMATA; INDIRECT ROUTES; LETTER-TO-SOUND RULES; PERFORMANCE; PRONUNCIATION LEXICON; RE-ENGINEERING; REWRITE RULES; ROUTE LEARNING; TEXT-TO-SPEECH SYSTEM; TREE REPRESENTATION;

DECISION TREES;

EID: 30344440616     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Alan W. Black, Kevin Lenzo, and Vincent Pagel. 1998. Issues in building general letter to sound rules. In Proc. of the 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, pages 77-80.
2. Antal van den Bosch and Walter Daelemans. 1993. Data-oriented methods for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In Proc. of the 6th European Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 45-53.
3. Peter F. Brown, John Cocke, Stephen A. Delia Pietra, Vincent J. Delia Pietra, Fredrick Jelinek, John D. Lafferty, Robert L. Mercer, and Paul S. Rossin. 1990. A statistical approach to machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 16(2):79-85.
4. Walter M. P. Daelemans and Antal P. J. van den Bosch. 1997. Language-independent data-oriented grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In Jan P. H. van Santen, Richard W. Sproat, Joseph P. Olive, and Julia Hirschberg, editors, Progress in Speech Synthesis, pages 77-89. Springer, New York.
5. Dan Gildea and Dan Jurafsky. 1995. Automatic induction of finite state transducers for simple phonological rules. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 9-15.
6. Ronald M. Kaplan and Martin Kay. 1994. Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguistics, 20(3):331-378.
7. George Anton Kiraz. 1999. Compressed storage of sparse finite-state transducers. In Proc. of the 1999 Workshop on Implementing Automata, Potsdam, Germany.
8. Éric Laporte. 1997. Rational transductions for phonetic conversion and phonology. In Emmanuel Roche and Yves Schabes, editors, Finite-State Language Processing, chapter 14, pages 407-430. MIT Press, Cambridge.
9. Robert Luk and Robert Damper. 1996. Stochastic phonographic transduction for English. Computer Speech and Language, 10:133-153.
10. Corey Andrew Miller. 1998. Pronunciation Modeling in Speech Synthesis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
11. Mehryar Mohri and Richard Sproat. 1996. An efficient compiler for weighted rewrite rules. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 231-238.
12. Mehryar Mohri, Fernando Pereira, and Michael Riley. 1996. Weighted automata in text and speech processing. In Extended Finite State Models of Language: Proc. of the ECAI '96 Workshop, pages 46-50.
13. Mehryar Mohri, Fernando Pereira, and Michael Riley. 2000. The design principles of a weighted finite-state transducer library. Theoretical Computer Science, 231 (1): 17-32.
14. José Oncina, Pedro Garcia, and Enrique Vidal. 1993. Learning subsequential transducers for pattern recognition and interpretation tasks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(5):448-458.
15. J. R. Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
16. Michael D. Riley. 1991. A statistical model for generating pronunciation networks. In Proc. of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pages 737-740.
17. David B. Searls and Kevin P. Murphy. 1995. Automata-theoretic models of mutation and alignment. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, pages 341-349.
18. T. J. Sejnowski and C. R. Rosenberg. 1987. Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text. Complex Systems, 1:145-168.
19. Richard Sproat and Michael Riley. 1996. Compilation of weighted finite-state transducers from decision trees. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 215-222.
20. Richard Sproat, Bernd Möbius, Kazuaki Maeda, and Evelyne Tzoukermann. 1998. Multilingual text analysis. In (Sproat, 1998), chapter 3, pages 31-87.
21. Richard Sproat, editor. 1998. Multilingual Text-to-Speech Synthesis: The Bell Labs Approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
22. Richard Sproat. 2000. A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.