The dogit ordered generalized extreme value model

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 531-542

  Fry, Tim R L ^a   Harris, Mark N ^b  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Choice set generation; Generalized extreme value; Ordinal data

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344436322     PISSN: 13691473     EISSN: 1467842X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.00414.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BATCHELOR, R. & JONUNG, L. (1986). Information theory and group differences in inflation expectations. Discussion Paper 1, National Institute of Economic Research, Stockholm.
2. BORDLEY, R. (1990). The dogit model is applicable even without perfectly captive buyers. Transportation Research, Part B 24B, 315-323.
3. BRESHANAN, T., STERN, S. & TRAJTENBERG, M. (1997). Market segmentation and the sources of rent from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND Journal of Economics 28, 17-44.
4. BRISCHETTO, A. & DEBROUWER, G. (1999). Householders' inflation expectations. Discussion Paper 03, Reserve Bank of Australia.
5. CHANDRASEKHARAN, R., MCCARTHY, P. & WRIGHT, G. (1994). Structural models of brand loyalty with an application to the automobile market. Transportation Research, Part B 28B, 445-462.
6. DALE, J. (1986). Global cross-ratio models for bivariate discrete, ordered responses. Biometrics 42, 909-917.
7. FRY, T.R.L. & HARRIS, M. (1996). A Monte Carlo study of tests for the independence of irrelevant alternatives property. Transportation Research, Part B 30B, 19-30.
8. FRY, T.R.L., BROOKS, R.D., COMLEY, B. & ZHANG, J. (1993). Economic motivations for limited dependent and qualitative variable models. Economic Record 69, 193-205.
9. GAUDRY, M. (1980). Dogit and logit models of travel mode choice in Montreal. Canad. J. Econom. 13, 268-279.
10. GAUDRY, M. & DAGENAIS, M. (1979). The dogit model. Transportation Research, Part B 13B, 105-112.
11. GAUDRY, M. & WILLS, M. (1979). Testing the dogit model with aggregate time-series and cross-sectional travel data. Transportation Research, Part B 13B, 155-166.
12. HEITJAN, D. & RUBIN, D. (1991). Ignorability and coarse data. Ann. Statist. 19, 2244-2253.
13. KANNAN, P. & YIM, C.K. (2001). An investigation of the impact of promotions on across submarket competition. J. Business Research 53, 137-149.
14. KOPPELMAN, F. & WEN, C. (2000). The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application. Transportation Research, Part B 34B, 75-89.
15. MADDALA, G.S. (1983). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. MANSKI, C. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis. 8, 229-254.
17. MCFADDEN, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, eds A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist & J. Weibull, pp. 75-96. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
18. MOLENBERGHS, G. & EMMANUEL, L. (1994). Marginal modelling of correlated ordinal data using a multivariate Plackett distribution. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89, 633-644.
19. SELF, S. & LIANG, K.Y. (1987). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard Conditions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82, 605-610.
20. SMALL, K. (1987). A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 55, 409-424.
21. SMALL, K. (1994). Approximate generalized extreme value models of discrete choice. J. Econometrics 62, 351-382.
22. SWAIT, J. (2001). Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transportation Research, Part B 35B, 643-666.
23. SWAIT, J. & BEN-AKIVA, M. (1987). Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: Mode choice in Sao Paulo Brazil. Transportation Research, Part B 21B, 103-115.
24. THURSTONE, L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34, 273-286.
25. TSE, Y. (1987). A diagnostic test for the multinomial logit model. J. Business and Economic Statist. 7, 61-65.
26. VOVSHA, P. (1998). The cross-nested logit model: Application to mode choice in the Tel Aviv metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 1607, 6-15.
27. WEN, C. & KOPPELMAN, F. (2001). The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research, Part B 35B, 627-641.
28. Wu, P. & KING, M.L. (1994). One-sided hypothesis testing in econometrics: a survey. Pakistan J. Statist. 10, 261-300.