Extending work sampling to behavioral and cognitive concepts

IIE Annual Conference and Exhibition 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1075-1080

  Besterfield Sacre, Mary ^a   Newcome, Elaine ^a   Shuman, Larry ^a   Wolfe, Harvey ^a  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective domain; Behavioral observation; Cognitive domain; Sampling interval; Work sampling

Indexed keywords

AFFECTIVE DOMAIN; BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION; COGNITIVE DOMAIN; SAMPLING INTERVAL; WORK SAMPLING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PROBABILITY; SAMPLING;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 30044449346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Hendricks, G.C. et. al., 1974, "Effects of Behavioral Self Observation on Elementary Teachers and Students," Technical Report No. 121, Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Stanford University, CA.
2. Aft, L., 2000, Work Measurement and Methods Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
3. Chapanis, A., 1959, Research Techniques in Human Engineering, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
4. Wolfe, H. and J.P. Young, "Staffing the Nursing Unit: Part I - Controlled Variable Staffing," Nursing Research, Summer 1965.
5. Wolfe, H. and J.P. Young, "Staffing the Nursing Unit: Part II - Multiple Assignment Technique," Nursing Research, Fall 1965.
6. Collins, M.A., 1996, "Implications of students' beliefs about the nature of ability for classroom experiences and learning." Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, Vol. 57.
7. Wolfe, R.N., 2001, The Experience Sampling Method and Career Counseling: The interrelations of situated experience, work values, and career orientation among adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Chicago.
8. Wolfe, R.N., 2000, "Situated Subjective Experience and Global Work Values: The Experience Sampling Method as a Career Counseling Tool for Adolescents," Unpublished symposium presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference April, New Orleans, Louisiana.
9. Bloom, B.S., M.D. Englehart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D.R. Krathwohl, 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, Longman, New York.
10. Krathwohl, D.R., B.S. Bloom, and B.B. Masia, 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals Handbook II: Affective Domain, McKay Company, Inc., New York.
11. See web reference , referenced March 23, 2004.
12. Assessment Processes in Engineering Education, hosted by G. Rogers and the National Science Foundation. See web reference , referenced March 23, 2004.
13. Besterfield-Sacre, M.E., L.J. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C.J. Atman, J. McGourty, R.L. Miller, B.M. Olds, and G.M. Rogers, "Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC 2000," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 43(2), April 2000, pp. 100-110.
14. Engineering Education: Assessment Methodologies and Curricula Innovations (NSF EEC-9872498) and Engineering Education: Assessment Methodologies and Curricula Innovations II (NSF DUE-0121520).
15. Sagoutin, M.J., C.J. Atman, R. Adams, T. Rutar, J.C. Kramlich, and J.L. Fridley, 2000, "A Design Attribute Framework for Course Planning and Learning Assessment," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 43(2), 188-199.
16. Mehalik, M.M. and C.D. Schunn, 2003, "What Constitutes Good Design? A Review of Empirical Studies of Design Processes," working paper.
17. Anderson, V.L., and R.A. McLean, 1974, Design of Experiments: A Realistic Approach, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.