Constructing a taxonomy to support multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts

Journal of Zhejiang University: Science

Volumn 6 A, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1258-1267

  Ou, Shi Yan ^a   Khoo, Christopher S G ^a   Goh, Dion H ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Automatic multi document summarization; Digital library; Text summarization; Variable based framework

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

AUTOMATIC MULTIDOCUMENT SUMMARIZATION; DISSERTATION ABSTRACTS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE; SUMMARIZATION PROCESS; TAXONOMY; TEXT SUMMARIZATION; VARIABLE BASED FRAMEWORK;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 30044433932     PISSN: 10093095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1258     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B., Hertenstein, B., Villiger, C., Ziegert, C., 2001. Constructing an Ontology for WWW Summarization in Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT). http://summitbmt.fh-hannover.de/Papers/Washington-Octo11.pdf.
2. Hovy, E., Lin, C.Y., 1999. Automated Text Summarization in SUMMARIST. In: Maybury, M.(Ed.), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. The MIT Press, p.71-80. http://www.isi.edu/-cyl/papers/ists97.pdf.
3. Japanainen, P., Jarvinen, T., 1997. A Non-projective Dependency Parser. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP), Washington, DC, p.64-71. http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/-tapanain/dg/doc/anlp97/anlp97.html.
4. Khoo, C., Ou, S.Y., Goh, D., 2002. A Hierarchical Framework for Multi-document Summarization of Dissertation Abstracts. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, Singapore, p.99-110.
5. Mani, I., Bloedorn, E., 1999. Summarization similarities and differences among related documents. Information Retrieval, 1(1): 1-23.
6. McKeown, K., Radev, R.D., 1995. Generating Summaries of Multiple News Articles. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR), Seattle, WA, p.74-82.
7. Medin, D.L., Lynch, E.B., Solomon, K.O., 2000. Are there kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology, 51: 149-169.
8. NISO (National Information Standards Organization), 2003. Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Thesauri. ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993. NISO Press, Bethesda, Maryland. http://www.niso.org/standards/standard_detail.cfm?std_id=518.
9. Ou, S.Y., Khoo, C., Goh, D., 2003. Multi-document Summarization of Dissertation Abstracts Using a Variable-based Framework. Proceedings of the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Long Beach, CA, p.230-239.
10. Ou, S.Y., Khoo C., Goh, D., Heng, H.H., 2004. Discourse Parsing of Sociology Dissertation Abstracts Using Decision Tree Induction. Proceedings of the 14th Annual ASIST SIG CR Workshop, Long Beach, CA.
11. Radev, R.D., 2000. A Common Theory of Information Fusion from Multiple Text Sources Step One: Cross-document Structure. Proceedings of the 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. http://www.sigdial.org/sigdial-workshop/proceedings/radev.pdf.
12. Radev, R.D., Jing, H., Budzikowska, M., 2000. Centroid-based Summarization of Multiple Documents: Sentence Extraction, Utility-based Evaluation and User Studies. Workshop Held with Applied Natural Language Processing Conference/Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ANLP/ANNCL), p.21-29.
13. Wollersheim, D., Rahayu, W., 2002. Methodology for Creating a Sample Subset of Dynamic Taxonomy to Use in Navigating Medical Text Databases. Proceedings International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS), Edmonton, Canada, p.276-84.