Evidence for infants' understanding of false beliefs should not be dismissed [2]

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 4-5

  Csibra, Gergely ^a   Southgate, Victoria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; LETTER; MENTAL TASK; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; CULTURE; HUMANS; INFANT; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RATS;

EID: 30044433040     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.011     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. T. Ruffman, and J. Perner Do infants really understand false belief? Response to Leslie Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 2005 462 463
2. K. Onishi, and R. Baillargeon Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308 2005 255 258
3. A.M. Leslie Developmental parallels in understanding minds and bodies Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 2005 459 462
4. J. Perner, and T. Ruffman Infants' insight into the mind: how deep? Science 308 2005 214 216
5. J.B. Morton, and Y. Munakata Active versus latent representations: a neural network model of perseveration, dissociation, and decalage Dev. Psychobiol. 40 2002 255 265
6. H. Wan Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory J. Neurosci. 19 1999 1142 1148
7. G. Gergely, and G. Csibra Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 2003 287 292
8. W.A. Clements, and J. Perner Implicit understanding of belief Cogn. Dev. 9 1994 377 395