A hybrid reality environment and its application to the study of earthquake engineering

Virtual Reality

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 17-33

  Hutchinson, Tara C ^a   Kuester, Falko ^a   Hsieh, Tung Ju ^a   Chadwick, Rebecca ^a  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Display technologies; Human computer interaction; Multimodal interaction; Virtual reality; Visualization

Indexed keywords

EID: 30044432231     PISSN: 13594338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-005-0001-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 3dMax (2003) 3D Studio Max Software Platform. http://www.3dmax.com/,2003.
2. Abowd GD (1999) Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Syst J 38(4):508-530
3. Abowd GD, Brotherton JA, Bhalodia J (2000) Classroom 2000: A system for capturing and accessing multimedia classroom experiences. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 98, May 2000
4. Bouchlaghem N, Sher W, Beacham N (2000) Computer imagery and visualization in civil engineering education. J Comput Civil Eng 14(2):134-140 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2000)14:2(134)
5. California Geological Survey (2003) California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP). http://www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/smip/ about.htm
6. Cross B, Smith S, Kennedy C, Arbogast S (2002) Virtual reality retrofit demonstrations. In: National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, MA
7. CUREE (1998) Conference and workshop on research on the Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994. Consortium of Universities for research in earthquake engineering. Sponsored by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP)
8. Future Computing Environments Group Georgia Institute of Technology eClass (2003) (Formerly Classroom2000). http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ eclass/
9. Haque ME (2001) Web-based visualization techniques for structural design education American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition
10. Johanson B, Fox A, Winograd T (2002) The interactive workspaces project: experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(2):71-78 10.1109/MPRV.2002.1012339
11. Lin C-R, Loftin RB (1998) Application of virtual reality in the interpretation of geoscience data. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, pp 187-194
12. Ponnekanti SR, Johanson B, Kiciman E, Fox A (2003) Portability extensibility and robustness in iROS. In: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (Percom 2003), Dallas-Fort Worth TX, March 2003, pp 11-19
13. Raskar R, Welch G, Cutts M, Lake A, Stesin L, Fuchs H (1998) The office of the future: A unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. In: Computer Graphics Proceedings SIGGRAPH, Orlando Florida July 1998. ACM
14. SCEDC (2003) Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC). http://www.scecdc.scec.org/
15. Sebok A, Nystad E, Helgar S (2004) Navigation in desktop virtual environments: An evaluation and recommendations for supporting usability. Virtual Reality 8(1):26-40 10.1007/s10055-004-0133-1
16. Smith SP, Marsh T (2004) Evaluating design guidelines for reducing user disorientation in a desktop virtual environment. Virtual Reality 8(1):55-62 10.1007/s10055-004-0137-x
17. Stanford University Department of Computer Science (2003) iRoom - Stanford Interactive Workspaces Project. http://graphics.stanford.edu/ projects/iwork/room.html
18. Trifunac MD, Ivanovic SS, Todorovska MI (1999) Instrumented 7-storey reinforced concrete building in Van Nuys California: Description of the damage from the 1994 Northridge earthquake and strong motion data. Technical Report, 1999
19. UNC (2003) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science. Office of the Future Project. http://www.cs.unc.edu/ raskar/Office/
20. Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225-240