The progress of science and implications for science studies and for science policy

Perspectives on Science

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 236-278

  Bauer, Henry H ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29944443178     PISSN: 10636145     EISSN: 15309274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/106361403322495902     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Arp, Halton. 1998. Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science. Montreal: Apeiron.
2. Bailar, John C. III. 1995. Chronicle of Higher Education 21 April: B1, 2.
3. Balchin, Nigel. 1949. A Sort of Traitors. London: Collins (title in the U.S.A., Who is my Neighbor?).
4. Barber, Bernard. 1961. "Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery." Science 134: 596-602.
5. Bauer, Henry H. 1980. Unpublished; prepared for the Round Table Discussion on "Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery-the case of the Loch Ness Monster," Science & Technology Studies, Toronto 80 (joint meeting of History of Science Society, Philosophy of Science Association, Society for the History of Technology, Society for the Social Study of Science).
6. Bauer, Henry H. 1983. "Velikovsky and the Loch Ness Monster: Attempts at Demarcation in Two Controversies." In Working Papers of the Center for the Study of Science in Society (VPI&SU). Edited by Rachel Laudan. 2 (#1, April): 87-106.
7. Bauer, Henry H. 1984a. Beyond Velikovsky: The History of a Public Controversy. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
8. Bauer, Henry H. 1984b. "Velikovsky and Social Studies of Science." 4S Review, 2 (#4, Winter): 2-8.
9. Bauer, Henry H. 1986. The Enigma of Loch Ness: Making Sense of a Mystery. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10. Bauer, Henry H. 1990a. "A Dialectical Discussion on the Nature of Disciplines and Disciplinarity." Social Epistemology, 4: 215-227. (Text can be down-loaded from www.henryhbauer.homestead.com/Science.)
11. Bauer, Henry H. 1990b. "Barriers against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS). Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15: 105-119. (Text can be down-loaded from www.henryhbauer.homestead.com/Science.)
12. Bauer, Henry H. 1992. Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13. Bauer, Henry H. 1996. "The Anti-Science Phenomenon in Science & Technology Studies." Science Studies, 9 (#1): 34-49; reprinted as "Antiscience in Current Science and Technology Studies," chapter 2 (pp. 41-61) in Beyond the Science Wars (2000). Edited by Ullica Segerstråle. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Bauer, Henry H. 1997. "A Consumer's Guide to Science Punditry." Pp. 22-34 in Science Today: Problem or Crisis? Edited by Ralph Levinson and Jeff Thomas. London: Routledge.
15. Bauer, Henry H. 2001a. Science or Pseudoscience: Magnetic Healing, Psychic Phenomena, and Other Heterodoxies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
16. Bauer, Henry H. 2001b. Fatal Attractions: The Troubles with Science. New York: Paraview Press.
17. Bauer, Henry H. 2002. "'Pathological Science' Is Not Scientific Misconduct (Nor Is It Pathological)." HYLE (International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry), 8 (#1, April): 5-20.
18. Beaudette, Charles G. 2000. Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed. South Bristol, ME: Oak Grove Press.
19. Bell Burnell, S. Jocelyn. 1977. "Petit four" (after-dinner speech). Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 302: 685-689.
20. Brody, Howard, with Daralyn Brody. 2000. The Placebo Response: How You Can Release the Body's Inner Pharmacy for Better Health. New York: Cliff Street Books (HarperCollins).
21. Carpenter, Kenneth J. 2002. "Prematurity and Delay in the Prevention of Scurvy." Pp. 87-91 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Comfort, Nathaniel C. 2002. "Barbara McClintock's Controlling Elements: Premature Discovery or Stillborn Theory?" Pp. 175-99 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Daston, Lorraine. 2000. "Preternatural Philosophy." Pp. 15-41 in Biographies of Scientific Objects. Edited by Lorraine Daston. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Donovan, Arthur, Larry Laudan, and Rachel Laudan, eds. 1992. Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Duesberg, Peter H. 1996. Inventing the AIDS Virus.Washington: Regnery.
26. Edge, David O., and Michael J. Mulkay. 1976. Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain. New York: Wiley.
27. Franks, Felix. 1981. Polywater. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Franklin, Allan. 1986. The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gerson, Elihu M. 2002. "Premature Discovery Is Failure of Intersection among Social Worlds." Pp. 280-91 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Ghiselin, Michael T. 2002. "Prematurity, Evolutionary Biology, and the Historical Sciences." Pp. 239-49 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Glen, William. 2002. "A Triptych to Serendip: Prematurity and Resistance to Discovery in the Earth Sciences." Pp. 92-108 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Harrington, Anne, ed. 1997. The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Hetherington, Norriss S. 2002. "Theories of an Expanding Universe: Implications of Their Reception for the Concept of Scientific Prematurity." Pp. 109-123 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35. Hilton, James. 1947. Nothing so Strange. Boston: Little, Brown.
36. Holmes, Frederic L. 2002. "Prematurity and the Dynamics of Scientific Change." Pp. 164-174 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Hook, Ernest B., ed. 2002a. Prematurity in Scientific Discovery: On Resistance and Neglect. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Hook, Ernest B., ed. 2002b. A Background to Prematurity and Resistance to 'Discovery'." Pp. 3-21 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39. Hook, Ernest B., ed. 2002c. "Interdisciplinary Dissonance and Prematurity: Ida Noddack's Suggestion of Nuclear Fission." Pp. 124-148 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Hull, David L. 2002. "Prematurity and Promise: Why was Stent's Notion of Prematurity Itself So Premature?" Pp. 329-341 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Hull, David L., Peter D. Tessner, and Arthur M. Diamond. 1978. "Planck's Principle." Science, 202: 717-23.
42. Jones, Martin. 2002. "The Concept of Prematurity and the Philosophy of Science." Pp. 306-326 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.
44. Koestler, Arthur. 1964. The Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.
45. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Lamb, D. and S. M. Easton. 1984. Multiple Discovery: The Pattern of Scientific Progress. England: Avebury (printed at Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK).
47. Langmuir, Irving. 1953. "Pathological Science." Seminar, General Electric R&D Center. Transcribed by R. N. Hall and published as Report no. 68-C-035, April 1968 (contains transcript of question-and-answer session). Re-published as "Pathological Science: Scientific Studies Based on Non-Existent Phenomena," Speculations in Science and Technology 8 (#2, 1985) 77-94 (with added references but without question-andanswer section). Re-published as "Pathological Science," Physics Today October 1989, 36-48 (revised Epilogue by R. N. Hall, fewer references than in Speculations, no question-and-answer section).
48. Laudan, Larry. 1983. "The demise of the demarcation problem." Pp. 111-127 in Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Edited by R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
49. Lewis, Sinclair. 1925. Arrowsmith. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
50. Löwy, Ilana. 2002. "Fleck, Kuhn, and Stent: Loose Reoections on the Notion of Prematurity." Pp. 295-305 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. Marks, John. 1983. Science and the Making of the Modern World. Oxford: Heinemann.
52. Maynard Smith, John, and Eörs Szathmáry. 1999. The Origins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. McGrayne, S. B. 1993. Nobel Women in Science. New York: Birch Lane; cited in Comfort (2002).
54. Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press. The chapter from which pages are cited was first published as "Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105 (no. 5, October 1961): 470-486.
55. Motulsky, Arno G. 2002. "The Work of Joseph Adams and Archibald Garrod: Possible Examples of Prematurity in Human Genetics." Pp. 200-210 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56. Munévar, Gonzalo. 2002. "Reflections on Hull's Remarks." Pp. 342-345 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57. Nye, Mary Jo. 2002. "Michael Polanyi's Theory of Surface Adsorption: How Premature?" Pp. 151-163 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
58. Planck, Max. 1949. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. New York: Philosophical Library.
59. Root-Bernstein, Robert S. 1993. Rethinking AIDS: The Tragic Costs of Premature Consensus. New York: Free Press.
60. Ruse, Michael. 2002. "The Prematurity of Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection." Pp. 213-238 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61. Sacks, Oliver. 2002. "Scotoma: Forgetting and Neglect in Science." Pp. 70-83 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
62. Shapiro, Arthur K., and Elaine Shapiro. 1997. The Powerful Placebo-From Ancient Priest to Modern Physician. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63. Snow, C. P. 1963. The Two Cultures: and a Second Look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Stent, Gunther S. 1972a. Prematurity and Uniqueness in Scientific Discovery." Scientific American, December: 84-93.
65. Stent, Gunther S. 1972b. "Prematurity and Uniqueness in Scientific Discovery." Advances in the Biosciences, 8: 433-49.
66. Stent, Gunther S. 2002a. "Prematurity in Scientific Discovery." Pp. 22-33 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67. Stent, Gunther S. 2002b. "Comments." Pp. 346-353; in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68. Stephan, Paula E., and Sharon G. Levin. 1992. Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
69. Stern, Lawrence H. 2002. "The Impact and Fate of Gunther Stent's Prematurity Thesis." Pp. 260-279 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
70. Stigler, S. M. 1980. "Stigler's Law of eponymy." Transactions of the New York Academy of Science II, 39: 147-158.
71. Tobias, Phillip V. 1984. Dart, Taung and the 'Missing Link.' Johannesburg (South Africa): Witwatersrand University Press.
72. Tobias, Phillip V. 1996. "Premature Discoveries in Science with Especial Reference to Australopithecus and Homo habilis." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 140 (no. 1, March): 49-64.
73. Townes, Charles H. 2002. "Resistance to Change and New Ideas in Physics: A Personal Perspective." Pp. 46-58 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74. Tullock, Gordon. 1966. The Organization of Inquiry. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
75. Von der Muhll, George. 2002. "The Prematurity of 'Prematurity' in Political Science." Pp. 253-59 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
76. Watson, James D. 1968. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum.
77. Westrum, Ron. 1982. "Social Intelligence about Hidden Events." Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3 (#3, March): 381-400.
78. Ziman, John. 1987. Knowing Everything about Nothing: Specialization and Change in Scientific Careers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Ziman, John. 1994. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Zinder, Norton D. 2002. "The Timeliness of the Discoveries of the Three Modes of Gene Transfer in Bacteria." Pp. 59-69 in Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Edited by Ernest Hook. Berkeley: University of California Press.
81. Zuckerman, Harriet A., and Lederberg, Joseph. 1986. "Postmature Scientific Discovery?" Nature, 324: 629-31.