|
Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 33-37
|
Junking good science: Undoing Daubert v Merrill Dow through cross-examination and argument
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COURT;
HEALTH HAZARD;
LAW SUIT;
LUNG CANCER;
MEDICAL EXPERT;
PEER REVIEW;
REVIEW;
SMOKING;
TOBACCO INDUSTRY;
EXPERT TESTIMONY;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
SCIENCE;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TOBACCO INDUSTRY;
|
EID: 29944440168
PISSN: 00900036
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.063917 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (11)
|