A case study in dissemination: Lessons learned from a pilot study involving the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service

Journal of Health Communication

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 219-233

  Marcus, Alfred C ^a   Heimendinger, Jerianne ^a   Berman, Ellen ^b   Strecher, Victor ^c   Bright, Mary Anne ^d   Allen, Amy Reasinger ^e   Davis, Sharon W ^f   Julesberg, Karen ^g   Mowad, Linda Z ^h   Nguyen, Lynne H ⁱ   Perocchia, Rosemarie ^j   Thomsen, Chris ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Aspen Systems Corporation   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^h YALE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^j MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PILOT PROJECTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 29944438585     PISSN: 10810730     EISSN: 10870415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10810730500257689     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognition theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Clark, G. N. (1995). Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: Methodological issues and procedures. J. Consult Clin Psych, 63, 718-725.
4. Committee on Quality Health Care in American. (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: A new system for the 21st century, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health, 93, 1261-1267.
6. Haider, M. and Kreps, G. L. (2004). Forty years of diffusion of innovations: Utility and value in public health. J. Health Communications, 9, 3-11.
7. Heimendinger, J., O'Neill, C., Marcus, A. C., Wolfe, P., Julesberg, K., et al. (2005). Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the Cancer Information Service. J Health Communication, 10(S1), 65-82.
8. Heimendinger, J. & Stables, G. (Eds.). (2001). 5 A Day for better health program. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute Monograph. National Institutes of Health Publication 01-5019.
9. Janz, N. K. & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1-47.
10. Marcus, A. C. (1998). The Cancer Information Service Research Consortium: A brief retrospective and a preview of the future. Prev Med, 27(5), S93-S99.
11. National Cancer Institute (NCI). (2002). Designing for dissemination: Conference summary report. Washington, DC.
12. Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change for smoking: Toward an integrative mode of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
13. Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of change, Homewood, IL: Dow Jones/Irwin.
14. Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behavior (pp. 3-27). New York: Plenum Press.
15. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed., New York: Free Press.
16. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed., New York: Free Press.
17. Serdula, M., Coates, R., Byers, T., Mokdad, A., Jewell, S., et al. (1993). Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiol, 4(5), 455-463.