Electrochemically controlled hydrogen bonding. Redox-dependent formation of a 2:1 diarylurea/dinitrobenzene2- complex

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 26, 2005, Pages 10817-10822

  Chan Leonor, Cindy ^a   Martin, Stephanie L ^a   Smith, Diane K ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE TRANSFER; COMPLEXATION; CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BONDS; PROTONS; REDUCTION;

1,2-DINITROBENZENE; PROTON TRANSFER; REDUCTION SHIFTS;

BENZENE;

1,2 DINITROBENZENE; 1,3 DINITROBENZENE; 1,4 DINITROBENZENE; ANION; CARBANILIDE; N,N DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE; NITROBENZENE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UREA; UREA DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTRON; HYDROGEN BOND; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; POTENTIOMETRY; PROTON TRANSPORT; STOICHIOMETRY;

EID: 29944436010     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo051893m     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bu, J.; Lilienthal, N. D.; Woods, J. E.; Nohrden, C. E.; Hoang, K. T.; Truong, D.; Smith, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6423-6429.
2. Maki, A. H.; Geske, D. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1960, 33, 825-832.
3. (a) Gupta, N.; Linschitz, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6384-6391.
4. (b) Macias-Ruvalcaba, N. A.; Gonzalez, I.; Aguilar-Martinez, M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, e110-e118.
5. Gomez, M.; Gonzalez, F. J.; Gonzalez, I. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2005, 578, 193-202.
6. Leventis, N.; Rawaswdeh, A.-M. M.; Zhang, G.; Elder, I. A.; Sotiriou-Leventis, C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7501-7510.
7. Nielsen, M. F.; Parker, V. D. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B 1988, 42, 93-100.
8. Ge, Y.; Miller, L.; Ouimet, T.; Smith, D. K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8831-8838.
9. For some reviews, see: (a) Tucker, J. H. R.; Collinson, S. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 147-156.
10. (b) Kaifer, A. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 62-71.
11. Boulas, P. L.; Gomez-Kaifer, M.; Echegoyen, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 216-247.
12. Beer, P. D.; Gale, P. A.; Chen, Z. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1998, 31, 1-89.
13. For some examples, see: (a) Beer, P. D.; Chen, Z.; Pilgrim, A. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 444, 209.
14. (b) Beer, P. D.; Chen, Z.; Grieve, A.; Haggitt, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2413.
15. (a) Cooke, G.; Sindelar, V.; Rotello, V. M. Chem. Commun. 2003, 752-753.
16. (b) Castro, R.; Cuadrado, I.; Alonso, B.; Casado, C. M.; Moran, M.; Kaifer, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5760.
17. Carroll, J. B.; Gray, M.; McMenimen, K. A.; Hamilton, D. G.; Rotello, V. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3177-3180.
18. Gomez, M.; Gomez-Castro, C. Z.; Padilla-Martinez, I. I.; Martinez-Martinez, F. J.; Gonzalez, F. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 567, 269-276.
19. Miller, S. R.; Gustowski, D. A.; Chen, Z.; Gokel, G. W.; Echegoyen, L.; Kaifer, A. E. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 2021-2024.
20. 2. Note that the E's used for the simulations are relative to an Ag wire reference, so they differ in an absolute sense from those seen in Figure 4 where the voltage is relative to the ferrocene/ferrocenium redox potential.