MIS total hip replacement with a single posterior approach

Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 179-185

  Dorr, Lawrence D ^a   Long, William T ^a   Inaba, Yutaka ^b   Sirianni, Leigh Ellen ^a   Boutary, Myriam ^a  

^a Centinela Freeman Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^b YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

MIS total hip replacement; Single incision posterior approach

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 29844450200     PISSN: 10454527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2005.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. S.T. Woolson C.S. Mow F. Syquiaj et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision J Bone Joint Surg 86A 2004 1353-1358
2. R.A. Berger P.J. Duwelius The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Technique and results Orthop Clin North Am 35 2004 163-172
3. L.D. Dorr Hip Arthroplasty: Minimally Invasive Techniques and Computer Navigation 2005 Elsevier Philadelphia
4. L.D. Dorr Y. Hishiki Z. Wan et al. Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement Iowa Orthop J 25 2005 1-9
5. D.D. D'Lima A.C. Urquhart K.O. Buehler et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios J Bone Joint Surg 82A 2000 315-321
6. R.P. Robinson P.T. Simonian I.M. Gradisar et al. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg 79B 1997 140-146
7. R.A. Berger J.J. Jacobbs R.M. Meneghini et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 2004 239-247
8. A.G. Greenwald M.R. Banaji Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes Psychol Rev 102 1995 427
9. L. Ogonda R. Wilson P. Archibold et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial J Bone Joint Surg 87A 2005 701-710
10. G.F. Chimento V. Pavone N. Sharrock et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty 20 2005 139-144
11. J.F. Wenz I. Gurkan S.R. Jibodh Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: A comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes Orthopedics 25 2002 1031-1043
12. A. DiGioia A. Plakseychuck T. Levison et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation J Arthroplasty 18 2003 123-128
13. R.A. Berger Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: Technique and results Orthop Clin North Am 35 2004 143-151
14. J.R. Howell B.A. Masri C.P. Duncan Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: A comparative study Orthop Clin North Am 35 2004 153-162
15. J.M. Wright H.C. Crockett S. Delgado et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, controlled, investigation with 5 year follow-up evaluation J Arthroplasty 19 2004 538-545
16. M.J. Archibeck R.E. White Jr Learning curve for the two incision total hip replacement Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 2004 232-238
17. W.Y. Shon T. Baldini M.G. Peterson et al. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty: A study of retrieved acetabular components J Arthroplasty 20 2005 426-435
18. M. Yamaguchi T. Akisue T.W. Bauer et al. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 15 2000 305-312