Enclosing surface drains: What's the story?

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2005, Pages

  Veliz, Mari ^a   Richards, Jane Sadler ^b  

^a Ausable Bayfield Conserv Authority   (Canada)

^b Cordner Science ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRAINAGE;

EID: 29844442579     PISSN: 00224561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Alexander, R.B., R.A. Smith, and G.E. Schwarz. 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758-761.
2. Bates, S. 2002. A guide to the provincial watershed project. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Queen's Printer, Toronto, Canada.
3. Bilby, R.E. and G.E. Likens. 1980. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61(5):1107-1113.
4. Bilby, R.E. 1981. Role of organic debris dams in regulation the export of dissolved and particulate matter from a forested watershed. Ecology 62(5):1234-1243.
5. Dieterich, M. and N.H. Anderson. 2000. The invertebrate fauna of summer-dry streams in western Oregon. Archive fur Hydrobiologie 147(3):273-295.
6. Dunne, T. and L.B. Leopold. 1978. Water in environmental planning. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, New York.
7. Hill, A.R., C.F. Labadia, and K. Sanmugadas. 1998. Hyporheic zone hydrology and nitrogen dynamics in relation to the streambed topography of a N-rich stream. Biogeochemistry 42:285-310.
8. Hill, A.R. and D.J. Lymburner. 1998. Hyporheic zone chemistry and stream-subsurface exchange in two groundwater-fed streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:495-506.
9. Lefebvre, S., P. Marmonier, and G.Pinay. 2004. Stream regulation and nitrogen dynamics in sediment interstices: Comparison of natural and straightened sectors of a third order stream. River Research and Applications 20:499-512.
10. Matthews, W.J. and J.T. Styron. 1981. Tolerance of headwater vs. mainstream fishes for abrupt physiochemical changes. American Midland Naturalist 105(1):149-158.
11. Meyer, J.L., L.A. Kaplan, D. Newbold, D.L. Strayer, C.J. Woltemade, J.B. Zedler, R. Beilfuss, Q. Carpenter, R. Semlitsch, M.C. Watzin, and P.H. Zedler. 2003. Where rivers are born: The scientific imperative for defending small streams and wetlands. American Rivers and Sierra Club, USA.
12. Peterson, B.J., W.M. Wollheim, P.J. Mulholland, J.R. Webster, J.L. Meyer, J.L.Tanks, E. Marti, W.B. Bowden, H.M. Valett, A.E. Hershey, W.H. McDowell, W.K. Dodds, S.K. Hamiton, S. Gregory, and D.D. Morrall. 2001. Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86-90.
13. Pinay, G., J.C. Clement, and R.J. Naiman. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes on nitrogen cycling in fluvial systems. Environmental Management 30(4):481-491.
14. Strahler, N.A. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 38(6):913-920.
15. Vannote, R.L., W.G. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedell, and C.E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130-137.