Analyzing relationships between closed labs and course activities in CS1

Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 183-187

  Soh, Leen Kiat ^a   Samal, Ashok ^a   Person, Suzette ^a   Nugent, Gwen ^b   Lang, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Closed Laboratories; Instructional Design

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LABORATORIES; COMPUTER SCIENCE COURSES; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; CURRICULA; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 29844440448     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1067445.1067497     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. R. McCauley, W. Parrs, G. Pothering, and C. Starr (2003). A Proposal to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Closed Laboratories in the Computer Science Curriculum, J. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 19(3):191-198.
2. ACM/IEEE Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula Staff, Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science, IEEE Press, 2002.
3. P.J. Denning, D. E. Comer, D. Gries, M. C. Mulder, A. Tucker, A. J. Turner, and P. R. Young (1989). Computing as a Discipline, CACM, 32(1):9-23.
4. A. Tucker, A., et al., (1991). Computing Curricula 1991: Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force", ACM Press.
5. B.C. Parker, and J. D. McGregor (1995). A Goal-Oriented Approach to Laboratory Development and Implementation, SIGSCE'95, Nashville, TN, pp. 92-96.
6. M.V. Doran and D. D. Langan (1995) A Cognitive-Based Approach to Introductory Computer Science Courses: Lessons Learned", SIGCSE'95, Nashville, TN, pp. 218-222.
7. B.S. Bloom, B. B. Mesia, and D. R. Krathwohl (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (two vols: The Affective Domain & The Cognitive Domain), David McKay, New York.
8. A.N. Kumar (2003). The Effects of Closed Labs in Computer Science I: An Assessment, J. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18(5):40-48.
9. M. Thweatt (1994). CS1 Closed Lab vs. Open Lab Experiment, SIGCSE'94, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 80-82.
10. R. Lischner (2001). Explorations: Structured labs for First-Time Programmers", SIGCSE'2001, Charlotte, NC, pp. 154-158.
11. J. Parker, R. Cupper, C. Kelemen, D. Molnar, and G. Scragg (1990). Laboratories in the Computer Science Curriculum, Computer Science Education, 1(3):205-221.
12. S. R. Oliver, and J. Dalbey (1994). A Software Development Process Laboratory for CS1 and CS2, SIGCSE'94, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 169-173.
13. J. K. Eaton (1991). Interactive Software for Self-Paced Instruction on Laboratory Instrumentation and Computerized Data Acquisition, http://www.siggraph.org/education/nsfcscr/projects/intro/eaton.html
14. B. Kurtz (1993). An Interdisciplinary, Laboratory-Oriented Courses Sequence for Computer-Based Problem Solving, http://www.siggraph.org/education/ nsfcscr/projects/intro/kurtz.html.
15. C. Prey (1995). Cooperative Learning in an Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum. http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/3c2/3c23/3c23.htm, 1995.
16. K. Robbins et al. (2001). Solving the CS1/CS2 Lab Dilemma: Students as Presenters in CS1/CS2 Laboratories, SIGCSE'2001, pp. 164-168.