Further restrictions for ICU research

Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 175-

  Klepstad, Pål ^a   Dale, Ola ^b  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

ICU; Informed consent; Research

Indexed keywords

AUSTRIA; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LAW; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORWAY; NOTE; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; NORWAY;

EID: 29844439586     PISSN: 03424642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2862-3     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Lemaire F (2004) A waiver of consent for intensive care research. Intensive Care Med 30:177-179
2. Dreyfuss D (2005) Is it better to consent to an RCT or to care? Intensive Care Med 31:345-355
3. Truog RD, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A (1999) Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med 340:804-807
4. Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J, Damas P, Druml C, Falke K, Kesecioglu J, Larsson A, Mancebo J, Matamis D, Pesenti A, Pimentel J, Ranieri M (2005) The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states' legislations with regard to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med 31:476-479
5. Liddell K, Menon DK, Zimmern R (2004) The human tissue bill and mental capacity bill. BMJ 328:1510-1511
6. Truog RD (2005) Will ethical requirements bring critical care research to a halt? Intensive Care Med 31:338-344
7. Norwegian Act Relating to Biobanks (2003) Chapter 3, § 12. Provisions on consent for research biobanks. http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/ lov-20030221-012-eng.pdf