Levels of processing effects on learning from texts with maps

Educational Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 133-155

  Scevak, Jill J ^a   Moore, Phillip J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29844431608     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144341980180201     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, J., 1983. Lix and Rix: variations on a little known readability index,. Journal of Reading, 26: 490–496.
2. Armbruster, B.B., and Anderson, T.H., 1988. On selecting ‘considerate’ content area textbooks,. Rase, 9: 47–52.
3. Andre, T., 1979. Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning?,. Review of Educational Research, 49: 280–318.
4. Bell, L.C., and Perfetti, C.A., 1994. Reading skill: some adult comparisons,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: 244–255.
5. Bernard, R.M., 1990. Using extended captions to improve learning from instructional illustrations,. British Journal of Educational Technology, 21: 215–225.
6. Biggs, J.B., 1987. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
7. Chan, L.K.S., and Youlden, A., Motivational orientations, strategic learning and achievement in years 5, 7 and 9 students: preliminary findings. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. December, Hobart.
8. Craik, F.I.M., and Lockhart, R.S., 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research,. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11: 671–684.
9. Dean, R., and Kulhavy, R.W., 1981. Influence of spatial organization in prose learning,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73: 57–64.
10. De-Lucas, D., and Di Vesta, F.J., 1980. Learner-generated organisational aids: effects on learning from text,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72: 304–311.
11. Everson, H., and Tobias, S., 1985. An ATI study of reading macroprocesses, Tech. Rep. No. 3 New York: City College of New York, Instructional Research Project.
12. Guri-Rozenblit, S., 1989. Effects of a tree diagram on students’ comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes,. Reading Research Quarterly, 24: 237–247.
13. Guthrie, J.T., Weber, S., and Kimmerly, N., 1993. Searching documents: processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables and illustrations,. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18: 186–221.
14. Hamaker, C., 1986. The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning,. Review of Educational Research, 56: 212–242.
15. Hamilton, R.J., 1985. A framework for the evaluation of the effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives,. Review of Education Research, 55: 47–85.
16. Johnson, J.T., Verdi, M.P., Kealy, W.A., Stock, W.A., and Haygood, R.C., 1995. Map perspective and the learning of text,. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20: 457–463.
17. Kintsch, W., 1994. Text comprehension, memory and learning,. American Psychologist, 49: 294–303.
18. Kirby, J.R., and Cantwell, R.H., 1985. Use of advance organisers to facilitate higher level text comprehension,. Human Learning, 4: 159–168.
19. Kirby, J.R., Jurisich, R., and Moore, P.J., Effects of map processing upon text comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Toronto, Canada.
20. Kirby, J.R., Moore, P.J, and Schofield, N.J., 1988. Verbal and visual learning styles,. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 86: 6–23.
21. Kulhavy, R.W., Lee, J.B., and Caterino, L.C., 1985. Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse,. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10: 28–37.
22. Kulhavy, R.W., and Stock, W., 1996. How cognitive maps are remembered,. Annals of the Association of American Cartographers, 1: 123–145.
23. Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., Peterson, S.E., Pridemore, D.R., and Klein, J.D., 1992. Using maps to retrieve text: a test of conjoint retention,. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17: 56–70.
24. Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., Verdi, M.P., Rittschof, K.A., and Savenye, W., 1993. Why maps improve memory for text: the influence of structural information on working memory operations,. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5: 375–392.
25. Mayer, R.E., and Sims, V.K., 1994. For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extension of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: 389–401.
26. McLeod, J., and Anderson, J., 1972. GAPADOL Reading Comprehension, Richmond: Heinemann. (Form Y)
27. Moore, P.J., Chan, L.K.S., and Au, W., 1993. High school students’ use of diagrams during reading,. Journal of Research in Reading, 16: 57–71.
28. Moore, P.J., and Scevak, J.J., The effects of strategy training on high school students’ learning from science text. Paper presented at the 5th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. August, Aix-en-Provence, France.
29. Moore, P.J., and Scevak, J.J., 1994. “ Systematic forced processing of text and graphic information ”. In Comprehension of Graphics, Edited by: Schnotz, W., and Kulhavy, R., 303–319. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30. Moore, P.J., and Scevak, J.J., 1997. Learning from texts and visual aids: a developmental perspective,. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2): 148–166.
31. Pearce, P.L., and Black, N., 1984. Dimensions of national park maps: a psychological evaluation,. Cartography, 13: 189–203.
32. Peeck, J., 1993. Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text,. Learning and Instruction, 3: 227–238.
33. Phillips, J.R., 1982. An experimental investigation of layer tints for relief maps in school atlases,. Ergonomics, 25: 1143–1154.
34. Reinking, D., Hayes, D.A., and McEneaney, J.F., 1988. Good and poor readers’ use of explicitly cued graphic aids,. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20: 229–247.
35. Reynolds, R.E., and Anderson, R.C., 1982. Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 623–632.
36. Scevak, J.J., 1995. High school students’ processing of texts and maps, Australia: The University of Newcastle. Doctoral dissertation.
37. Scevak, J.J., Moore, P.J., and Kirby, J.R., 1993. Training students to use maps to increase text recall,. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18: 401–413.
38. Tobias, S., 1987. Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79: 154–161.
39. Tobias, S., 1989. Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics,. Educational Psychologist, 24: 213–227.
40. Wade, S.E., and Adams, R.B., 1990. Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text. Journal of Reading Behavior, XXII: 331–353.
41. Winn, W.D., 1991. Learning from maps and diagrams,. Educational Psychology Review, 3: 211–247.
42. Winn, W.D., and Sutherland, S.W., 1989. Factors influencing the recall of elements in maps and diagrams and the strategies used to encode them,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 33–39.
43. Winograd, P.N., 1984. Strategic difficulties in summarising texts,. Reading Research Quarterly, 19: 404–424.