Assessment of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement with 99mTc-DPD-SPECT/spiral-CT hybrid imaging

NuklearMedizin

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2005, Pages

  Romer W ^a   Olk, A ^a   Hennig, F F ^a   Bautz, W ^a   Kuwert, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICARBOXYPROPANE DIPHOSPHONATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; DRUG UPTAKE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING; MALE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIOGRAPHY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DIPHOSPHONATES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOTECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 29744469772     PISSN: 00295566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Claus AM, Walde TA, Leung SB et al. Management of patients with acetabular socket wear and pelvic osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 112-7.
2. 18F-FDG uptake patterns in PET for diagnosis of septic and aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. Nuklearmedizin 2003; 42: 234-9.
3. Goldring SR, Jasty M, Roelke MS et al. Formation of a synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface. Its role in bone resorption and implant loosening after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 836-42.
4. Kroger H, Vanninen E, Overmyer M et al. Periprosthetic bone loss and regional bone turnover in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using high resolution single photon emission tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 487-92.
5. Leung S, Naudie D, Kitamura N et al. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87-A: 592-7.
6. Looney RJ, Boyd A, Totterman S et al. Volumetric computerized tomography as a measurement of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis and its correlation with wear. Arthritis Res 2002; 4: 59-63.
7. Park JS, Ryu KN, Hong HP et al. Focal osteolysis in total hip replacement: CT findings. Skeletal Radiology 2004; 33: 632-40.
8. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH et al. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A: 609-14.
9. Römer W, Fiedler E, Pavel M et al. Attenuation correction of SPECT images based on separately performed CT: Effect on the measurement of regional uptake values. Nuklearmedizin 2005; 44: 20-8.
10. Schwarz EM, Campbell D, Totterman S et al. Use of volumetric computerized tomography as a primary outcome measure to evaluate drug efficacy in the prevention of peri-prosthetic osteolysis: a 1-year clinical pilot of etanercept vs. placebo. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 1049-55.
11. Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, David EF et al. A comparison of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques to assess aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 2456-63.
12. Walde TA, Mohan V, Leung S et al. Sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs for detection of medial-wall perforation secondary to osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 20-4.