Local choices for development impact fees

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 338-357

  Jeong, Moon Gi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth management; Impact fees; Intergovernmental relations; Local government; Policy innovation; Political institutions

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; INNOVATION; INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PROPERTY RIGHTS;

EID: 29744464088     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087405282178     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrahamson, E., and L. Rosenkopf. 1993. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review 18 (3): 487-517.
2. Alston, L. J. 1996. Empirical work in institutional economics. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 25-30. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3. Altshuler, A. A., and J. Gomez-Ibanez. 1993. Regulation for revenue. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute.
4. Banfield, E., and J. Q. Wilson. 1963. City politics. New York: Vintage Books.
5. Benton, J. E. 2002. County service delivery: Does government structure matter? Public Administration Review 62 (4): 471-479.
6. Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395-415.
7. Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1999. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the policy process, edited by P. A. Sabatier, 169-200. Colorado: Westview Press.
8. Box-Steffensmeier, J., and B. Jones. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Brace, P. 1993. State government and economic performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
10. Burge, G. 2004. A theoretical and empirical investigation of the effects of impact fees on the affordability of starter homes. Ph.D. diss., Florida State University.
11. Clark, T. N., and E. Goez. 1994. The antigrowth machine: Can city governments control, limit or manage growth? In Urban innovations: Creative strategies for turbulent times, edited by T. N. Clarke, 105-45. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Clingermayer, J. C., and R. C. Feiock. 2001. Institutional constraints and policy choice. New York: SUNY Press.
13. DeGrove, J. M. 1986. Beyond the Growth Management Act of 1985. In Perspectives on Florida's Growth Management Act of 1985, edited by J. Degrove, 191-97. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14. DeSantis, V., and T. Renner. 1994. The impact of political structures on public policies in American counties. Public Administration Review 54 (3): 291-95.
15. Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic behavior and institutions. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
16. Feiock, R. C., and J. Carr. 2001. Incentives, entrepreneurs, and boundary change: A collective action framework. Urban Affairs Review 36 (3): 382-405.
17. Feiock, R. C. and J. Kim. 2001. Form of government, administrative organization, and economic development. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (1): 29-49.
18. Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations (FACIR). 1986. Impact fees in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: FACIR.
19. Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations (FACIR). 1991. 1991 Florida impact fee report. Tallahassee, FL: FACIR.
20. Frank, J., and P. Downing. 1988. Patterns of impact fees use. In Development impact fees, edited by A.C. Nelson, 3-21. Chicago: Planners Press.
21. Goetz, E. 1990. Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly 26 (2): 170-90.
22. Goetz, E. 1994. Expanding possibilities in local development policy: An examination of U.S. cities. Political Science Quarterly 47 (1): 85-109.
23. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
24. Juergensmeyer, J. C. 1988. The development of regulatory impact fees: The legal issues. In Development impact fees, edited by A. C. Nelson, 96-112. Chicago: Planners Press.
25. Knoke, D. 1983. The spread of municipal reform: Temporal, spatial, and social dynamics. American Journal of Sociology 87 (6): 1314-39.
26. Kolo, J., and T. J. Dicker. 1993. Practical issues in adopting local impact fees. State and Local Government Review 25 (3): 197-206.
27. Lee, R., R. Johnson, and P. Joyce. 2004. Public Budgeting Systems. 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
28. Libecap, G. D. 1989. Contracting for property rights. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
29. Libecap, G. D. 1996. Empirical work in institutional economics. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 34-58. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
30. Lineberry, R.L., and E.P. Fowler. 1967. Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review 61 (3): 701-16.
31. Logan, J. R., and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. California: Univ. of California Press.
32. Logan, J. R., R. B. Whaley, and K. Crowder. 1997. The character and consequences of growth regimes. Urban Affairs Review 32 (5): 603-30.
33. Lubell, M., R. C. Feiock, and R. Ramierez. 2005. Political institutions and conservation by local governments. Urban Affairs Review 40 (6): 706-29.
34. Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 148-63.
35. Molotch, H. 1976. The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology 8 (2): 309-30.
36. Morgan, D. R., and K. Kickham. 1999. Changing the form of county government: Effects on revenue and expenditure policy. Public Administration Review 59 (4): 315-24.
37. Nelson, A., ed. 1988. Development impact fees. Chicago: Planners Press.
38. Nelson, A., and M. Moody. 2003. Impact fees: The grease that sustains local economic development. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
40. Ostrom, E. 1999. Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process, edited by P.A. Sabatier, 37-52. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41. Pagano, M. A. 2002. Municipal capital spending during the "boom." Public Budgeting & Finance 22 (2): 1-20.
42. Peterson, J., and T. McLoughlin. 1991. Debt policies and procedures. In Local government finance: Concepts and practices, edited by J. Peterson and D. Strachota, 293-320. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
43. Riker, W., and I. Sened. 1996. A political theory of the origin of property rights: Airport slots. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 283-303. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
44. Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
45. Ruhil, A. 2003. Structural change and fiscal flows: A framework for analyzing the effects of urban events. Urban Affairs Review 38 (3): 396-416.
46. Schneider, M. 1989. The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
47. Schneider, M. 1992. Understanding the growth machine: The missing link between local economic development and fiscal payoffs. Journal of Politics 54 (1): 214-30.
48. Schneider, M., and P. Teske. 1993. The antigrowth entrepreneur: Challenging the equilibrium of the growth machine. Journal of Politics 55 (3): 720-36.
49. Walker, J. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880-99.
50. Yinger, J. 1998. The incidence of development fees and special assessments. National Tax Journal 51 (1):23-41.