Corrigendum to "Individual tree height increment model for managed even-aged stands of ponderosa pine throughout the western United States using linear mixed effects models" [Forest Ecol. Manage. 221 (2006) 147-154] (DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.012);Individual tree height increment model for managed even-aged stands of ponderosa pine throughout the western United States using linear mixed effects models

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 221, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 147-154

  Uzoh, Fabian C C ^a   Oliver, William W ^a  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Height growth; Pinus ponderosa; Repeated measures analysis; Tree growth modeling

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

HEIGHT GROWTH; REPEATED MEASURE ANALYSIS; TREE-GROWTH MODELING;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH MODELING; HEIGHT;

FORESTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

PINUS PONDEROSA;

EID: 29744462602     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.011     Document Type: Erratum

References (66)

1. D. Alder A distance independent tree model for exotic conifer plantations in East Africa For. Sci. 25 1 1979 59 71
2. E. Assmann The Principles of Forest Yield Study 1970 Pergamon Press New York
3. Barrett, J.W., 1978. Height growth and site index curves for managed even-aged stands of ponderosa pine in the Pacific Northwest. US Forest Service Research Paper PNW 232. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
4. G.L. Baskerville Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass Can. J. For. Res. 2 1972 49 53
5. G.S. Biging Improved estimates of site index curves using a varying-parameter model For. Sci. 31 1 1985 248 259
6. Boldt, C.E., Van Deusen, J.L., 1974. Silviculture of ponderosa pine in the Black Hills: the status of our knowledge. US Forest Service Research Paper RM 124. US Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
7. H.E. Burkhart, R.C. Parker, M.R. Strub, and R.G. Oderwald Yield of Old-field Loblolly Pine Plantations 1992 School of Forestry and Wildlife Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. Publ. FWS-3-72
8. K.P. Burnham, and D.R. Anderson Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach second ed. 2002 Springer New York
9. R.J. Carroll, and D. Ruppert Transformation and Weighting in Regression 1988 Chapman and Hall New York
10. Cochran, P.H., Barrett, J.W., 1995. Growth and mortality of ponderosa pine poles thinned to various densities in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. US Forest Service Research Paper PNW 483. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
11. Cochran, P.H., Barrett, J.W., 1999a. Growth of ponderosa pine thinned to different stocking levels in central Oregon: 30-year results. US Forest Service Research Paper PNW 508. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
12. Cochran, P.H., Barrett, J.W., 1999b. Thirty-five-year growth of ponderosa pine saplings in response to thinning and understory removal. US Forest Service Research Paper PNW 512. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
13. Cole, D.M., Stage, A.R., 1972. Estimating future diameter of lodgepole pine. US Forest Service Research Paper INT 131. US Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
14. R. Curtis Height-diameter and height-diameter-age equations for second-growth Douglas-fir For. Sci. 13 4 1967 365 375
15. Curtis, R.O., Clendenen, G.W., DeMars, D.J., 1981. A new stand simulator for coast Douglas-fir: DFSIM user's guide. US Forest Service General Technical Report PNW 128. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
16. Dolph, K.L., 1988. Prediction of periodic basal area increment for young-growth mixed onifers in the Sierra Nevada. US Forest Service Research Paper PSW 190. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA.
17. D. Dunning, and L.H. Reineke Preliminary Yield Tables for Second-Growth Stands in the California Pine Region 1933 US Department of Agriculture, Technical Bull. 354
18. J.W. Flewelling, and L.V. Pienaar Multiplicative regression with lognormal error For. Sci. 27 2 1981 281 289
19. T.G. Gregoire, O. Schabenberger, and J.P. Barrett Linear modeling of irregularly spaced, unbalanced, longitudinal data from permanent plot measurements Can. J. For. Res. 25 1995 137 156
20. Hahn, J.T., Leary, R.S., 1979. Potential diameter growth function. A generalized forest growth projection system applied to the Lake States. US Department of Agriculture, General Technical Report NC-49.
21. Hall, D.B., Bailey, R.L., 2000. Predicting dominant height growth in forest plantations based on multilevel nonlinear mixed models. Univ. of Georgia Stat. Dep. Tech. Rep. #2000-5.
22. H. Hasenauer, and R.A. Monserud Biased prediction for tree height increment models developed from smoothed 'data' Ecol. Model. 98 1997 13 22
23. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction 2001 Springer New York
24. Holdaway, M.R., 1984. Modeling the effect of competition on tree diameter growth as applied in STEMS. US Department of Agriculture, General Technical Report NC-94.
25. W.M. Holmes Confidence building in simulation models as a practical process Proceedings of the 1983 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, 11-13 July 1983 Vancouver, B.C. The Society for Modeling and Simulation International, San Diego, California, USA 1983
26. H.J. Keselman, J. Algina, R.K. Kowalchuk, and R.D. Wolfinger A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 52 1999 63 78
27. R.K. Kowalchuk, and H.J. Keselman Mixed model pairwise multiple comparisons of repeated measures means Psychol. Methods 6 2001 282 296
28. A. Kozak, and R. Kozak Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Can. J. For. Res. 33 2003 976 987
29. Larsen, D.R., Hann, D.W., 1987. Height-diameter Equations for Seventeen Tree Species in Southwest Oregon. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA. Research Bulletin 49.
30. Lear, R.A., Holdaway, M.A., 1979. Modifier function. A Generalized Forest Growth Projection System Applied to the Lake States. US Department of Agriculture, General Technical Report NC-49.
31. R.C. Littell, J. Pendergast, and R. Natajan Modeling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data Stat. Med. 19 2000 1793 1819
32. G.L. Martin, and A.R. Ek A comparison of competition measures and growth models for predicting plantation red pine diameter and height growth For. Sci. 30 3 1984 731 743
33. D.G. Mayer, M.A. Stuart, and A.J. Swain Regression of real-world data on model output: an appropriate overall test of validity Agric. Syst. 45 1994 93 104
34. H.A. Meyer A mathematical expression for height curves J. For. 38 1940 415 420
35. W.H. Meyer Yield of Even-aged Stands of Ponderosa Pine 1938 US Department of Agriculture Technical Bull. 630
36. Minor, C.O., 1964. Site-index curves for young-growth ponderosa pine in northern Arizona. US Forest Service Research Note RM 37. US Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
37. Monserud, R.A., 1975. Methodology for simulating Wisconsin northern hardwood stand dynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin-Madison, USA. 173 p. (Univ. Microfilms 76-2496).
38. Morehead, L.A., 1996. Determining the factors influential in the validation of computer- based problem solving systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA. (University Microfilms UMI No. 9628864)
39. D.D. Munro Forest growth models - a prognosis J. Fries Proceedings - Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation 1974 Royal Coll. Stockholm For. Res. Note 30
40. Myers, C.A., 1967. Growing stock levels in even-aged ponderosa pine. US Forest Service Research Paper RM 33. US Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
41. Oliver, W.W., 1984. Brush reduces growth of thinned ponderosa pine in northern California. US Forest Service Research Paper PSW 172. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA.
42. W.W. Oliver Twenty-five-year growth and mortality of planted ponderosa pine repeatedly thinned to different stand densities in northern California West. J. Appl. For. 12 4 1997 122 130
43. W.W. Oliver Spacing and shrub competition influence 20-year development of planted ponderosa pine West. J. Appl. For. 5 3 1990 79 82
44. K.R. Popper Conjectures and Refutations 1963 Routledge and Kegan Paul London
45. Powers, R.F., Oliver, W.W., 1978. Site classification of ponderosa pine stands under stocking control in California. US Forest Service Research Paper PSW 128. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA.
46. J.O. Rawlings, S.G. Pantula, and D.A. Dickey Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool second ed. 1998 Springer-Verlag New York
47. L.H. Reineke Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests J. Agric. Res. 46 1933 627 638
48. Ritchie, M.W., 1999. A compendium of forest growth and yield simulators for the Pacific Coast States. US Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW 174. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
49. M.W. Ritchie, and D.W. Hann Equations for predicting basal area increment in Douglas-fir and grand fir For. Res. Lab. Res. Bull. 51 1985 Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA
50. Ronco Jr., F., Edminster, C.B., Trujillo, D.P., 1985. Growth of ponderosa pine thinned to different stocking levels in northern Arizona. US Forest Service Research Paper RM-262. US Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
51. R.G. Sargent Validation and verification of simulation models P.A. Farrington H.B. Nembhard D.T. Sturrock G.W. Evans Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, 5-8 December 1999, Phoenix, Ariz Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York 1999 39 48
52. Shifley, S.R., 1987. A generalized system of models forecasting central states tree growth. US Forest Service Research Paper NC-279.
53. S.R. Shifley, and G.J. Brand Chapman-Richards growth function constrained for maximum tree size For. Sci. 30 4 1984 1066 1070
54. H.H. Shugart A Theory of Forest Dynamics 1984 Springer-Verlag New York
55. R.D. Snee Validation of regression models: methods and examples Technometrics 19 1977 415 428
56. Stage, A.R., 1975. Prediction of height increment for models of forest growth. US Forest Service Research Paper INT 164. US Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
57. A.R. Stage An expression for the effect of slope, aspect and habitat type on tree growth For. Sci. 22 4 1976 457 460
58. US Forest Service Field instruments: stand examination - forest inventory US Forest Service Handbook 2404 1978 US Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Northern Region, Missoula, MT
59. F.C.C. Uzoh A height increment equation for young ponderosa pine plantations using precipitation and soil factors For. Ecol. Manage. 142 1-3 2001 191 201
60. Uzoh, F.C.C., Dolph, K.L., Anstead, J.R., 1998. Periodic annual diameter increment after overstory removal in mixed conifer stands. US Forest Service Research Paper PSW 238. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
61. R.D. Wright Validating dynamic models: an evaluation of tests of predictive powers Proceedings of 1972 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, 13-16 June 1972 San Diego, Calif. Simulation Councils, La Jolla, California, USA 1972
62. W.R. Wykoff A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the northern Rocky Mountains For. Sci. 36 4 1990 1077 1104
63. Wykoff, W.R., 1986. Supplement to user's guide for the stand prognosis model - version 5.0. US Forest Service General Technical Report INT 208. US Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
64. Wykoff, W.R., Monserud, R.A., 1988. Representing site quality in increment models: a comparison of methods. In: Ek, A.R., Shifley, S.A., Burk, T.E. (Eds.), Forest Growth Modeling and Prediction. US Forest Service General Technical Report NC-120.
65. Wykoff, W.R., Crookston, N.L., Stage, A.R., 1982. User's guide to the stand prognosis model. US Forest Service General Technical Report INT 133. US Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
66. Y. Yang, R.A. Monserud, and S. Huang An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models Can. J. For. Res. 34 2004 619 629