Biomechanical properties of regenerated bone by mandibular distraction osteogenesis

Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 67-70

  Li, Jihua ^a   Hu, Jing ^a   Wang, Dazhang ^a   Tang, Zhenglong ^a   Gao, Zhanwei ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Mandible; Osteogenesis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE STRENGTH; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; GOAT; MALE; MANDIBLE; NONHUMAN; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; REFERENCE VALUE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; GOATS; MALE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; PROBABILITY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REFERENCE VALUES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 29744456017     PISSN: 10081275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hu J, Li JH, Wang DZ, et al. Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening mandible in a goat model. Clin J Stomatol 2000;16:1-2.
2. Hu J, Tang ZL, Wang DZ, et al. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction. J Oral Maxillafac Surg 2001;59:1041-1045.
3. Schickendantz MS, Watson JT, Sferra JJ, et al. A model for evaluating the strength of bones lengthened by distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop 1992;275:248-252.
4. Walsh WR, Hamdy RC, Ehrlich MG, et al. Biomechanical and physical properties of lengthened bone in a canine model. Clin Orthop 1994;306:230-238.
5. Elovic RP, Hipp JA, Hayes WC. A method for measuring the structural properties of the rat mandible. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39:1029-1033.
6. Costantino PD, Friedman CD, Shindo ML, et al. Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:511-516.