Apparent versus true density for the volume-to-weight transformation in coal blends

Journal of Microscopy

Volumn 220, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 221-228

  Alvarez, Diego ^a   Borrego, A G ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DEL CARBÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coal blends; Coal petrography; Optical microscopy

Indexed keywords

MERCURY (METAL); METADATA; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; PETROGRAPHY;

BLENDED COALS; COAL BLENDS; COAL DENSITY; COAL PETROGRAPHIES; DENSITY VALUE; MATHEMATICAL FORMULAS; OPTICAL MICROSCOPES; SINGLE COALS; TRUE DENSITY; WEIGHT PERCENTAGES;

COAL;

COAL; MERCURY;

ACCURACY; DENSITY; EMPIRICISM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROSCOPE; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; WEIGHT;

EID: 29744449735     PISSN: 00222720     EISSN: 13652818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01532.x     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Alvarez, D. (2003) Mass to volume conversion in coal blends. ICCP News. 30, 36-39.
2. Davis, A. (2000) Petrographic determination of the composition of binary blends. Int. J. Coal Geol. 44, 325-338.
3. Franklin, R.S. (1948) A note on the true density, chemical composition and structure of coals and carbonized coals. Fuel, 27, 46-49.
4. Gan, H., Nandi, S.P. & Walker, P.L. Jr. (1972) Nature of the porosity in American coals. Fuel, 51, 272-277.
5. Huang, H., Wang, K., Bodily, D.M. & Hucka, V.J. (1995) Density measurements of Argonne Premium coal samples. Energy Fuels, 9, 20-24.
6. van Krevelen, D.W. (1961) Coal: Coal Science and Technology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
7. Ng, S.H., Fung, D.P.C. & Kim, S.D. (1984) Some physical properties of Canadian coals and their effect on coal reactivity. Fuel, 63, 1564-1569.
8. Suárez-Ruiz, I. (2004) Summary of the activities developed by the Coal Blends Working Group. ICCP News, 32, 14-21.
9. Toda, Y. (1972) Densities of coals measured with various liquids. Fuel, 51, 108-112.
10. Toda, Y. & Toyoda, S. (1972) Application of mercury porosimetry to coal. Fuel, 51, 199-201.