Attitudes Toward Inquiry-Based Teaching: Differences Between Preservice and In-service Teachers

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 71-76

  Damnjanovic, Arta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29644439246     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17450.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bartlett, M. S. (1951). A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 1.
2. Biological Science Curriculum Study. (1993). Developing biological literacy: A guide to developing secondary and post-secondary biology curriculum, Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS Innovative Science Education.
3. Bitner, B. L. (1991, April). Research interests: Comparison of preservice and inservice elementary teachers Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Lake Geneva, Wisconsin.
4. Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal reflections. New York: Teacher College Press.
5. Carnes, N. G., & Damnjanovic, A. (1992, April). A quantitative and qualitative study of in-servicing teachers to do inquiry teaching. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
6. Collins, A. (1998). National science education standards: A political document. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34(7), 711–727.
7. Costenson, K., & Lawson, A. E. (1986). Why isn't inquiry used more in classrooms The American Biology Teacher, 48(3), 150–158.
8. Damnjanovic, A. (1998). Ohio statewide systemic initiative (SSI) factors associated with urban middle school science achievement: Differences by student sex and race. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4(2–3), 217–235.
9. Gabel, D., Samuel, K. V., Helgelson, S., McGuire, S., Novak, J., & Butzow, J. (1987). Science education research interests of elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 659–677.
10. Jones, L. R., Mullis, I. V. S., Raizen, S. A., Weiss, I. R., & Weston, E. A. (1992). The 1990 science report card: NAEP assessment of fourth, eight, and twelfth graders Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
11. Kahle, J. B. (1985). Women biologists: A view and a vision. Bioscience, 35, 230–234.
12. Kahle, J. B. & Damnjanovic A. (1994). The effect of inquiry activities on elementary students' enjoyment, ease, and confidence in doing science: An analysis by sex and race. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 17–28.
13. Levin, T., Sabar, N., & Libman, Z. (1991). Achievements and attitudinal patterns of boys and girls in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 315–328.
14. Moore, J. A. (1993). Science as a way of knowing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
15. Mueller, J. D. (1986). Measuring social attitudes Teachers College Press: New York.
16. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
17. Uno, G. (1990). Inquiry in the classroom. Bioscience, 40(11), 841–843.
18. Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivism perspective in science and math learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21.