Dependence of enzyme reaction mechanism on protonation state of titratable residues and QM level description: Lactate dehydrogenase

Chemical Communications

Volumn , Issue 47, 2005, Pages 5873-5875

  Ferrer, Silvia ^a   Silla, Estanislao ^a   Tuñón, Iñaki ^a   Oliva, Mónica ^b   Moliner, Vicent ^b   Williams, Ian H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^c University of Bath Claverton Down   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ARTICLE; ENERGY TRANSFER; ENZYME MECHANISM; HYBRIDIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PH MEASUREMENT; PROTON TRANSPORT; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TITRIMETRY;

EID: 29644432365     PISSN: 13597345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b510735k     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. See the following references, where the method is explained and its accuracy compared with that obtained with other methods: (a) M. K. Gilson, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 1993, 15, 266-282;
2. (b) J. Antosiewicz, J. A. McCammon and M. K. Gilson, J. Mol. Biol., 1994, 238, 415-436.
3. C. R. Dunn, H. M. Wilks, D. J. Halsall, T. Atkinson, A. R. Clarke, H. Muirhead and J. J. Holbrook, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B., 1991, 332, 177-184.
4. See: P. Kedzierski, K. Moreton, A. R. Clarke and J. J. Holbrook, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 7247-7252 and references therein.
5. J. Wilkie and I. H. Williams, J. Am. Chem. SOc., 1992, 114, 5423-5425.
6. A. Yadav, R. M. Jackson, J. J. Holbrook and A. Warshel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 4800-4805.
7. S. Ranganathan and J. E. Gready, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, 5614-5618.
8. V. Moliner, A. J. Turner and I. H. Williams, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1271-1272.
9. V. Moliner and I. H. Williams, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1843-1844.
10. D. B. Wigley, S. J. Gamblin, J. P. Turkenburg, E. J. Dodson, K. Piontek, H. Muirhead and J. J. Holbrook, J. Mol. Biol., 1992, 223, 217-225.
11. M. J. Field, L. David and D. Rinaldo, personal communication.
12. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan and M. J. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 1983, 4, 187-217.
13. J. Gao, P. Amara, C. Alhambra and M. J. Field, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 4714-4721.
14. a calculations also showed changes in the protonated nitrogen (from Nδ to Nε) in some neutral histidines (157, 188, 266, 318).
15. J. Wilkie and I. H. Williams, unpublished work.
16. For a detailed description of the computational method see: S. Ferrer, J. J. Ruiz-Pernia, I. Tunon, V. Moliner, M. Garcia-Viloca, A. Gonzalez-Lafont and J. M. Lluch, J. Chem. Theor. Comput., 2005, 1, 750-761.
17. -1 which, considering that the chemical step is not the rate limiting step of LDH catalyzed reaction, would be the upper limit.
18. A. R. Clarke, D. B. Wigley, W. N. Chia, D. Barstow, T. Atkinson and J. J. Holbrook, Nature, 1986, 324, 699-702.