Potential losses in a repeat of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1157-1184

  Wong, Ivan ^a   Bouabid, Jawhar ^b   Graf, William ^a   Huyck, Charles ^c   Porush, Allan ^a   Silva, Walter ^d   Siegel, Timothy ^e   Bureau, Gilles ^a   Eguchi, Ronald ^c   Knight, John ^f  

^a URS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b PBS and J   (United States)

^c IMAGECAT INC   (United States)

^d Pacific Engineering and Analysis   (United States)

^e Pacific Engineering and Analysis ^*  (United States)

^f South Carolina Emergency Management Division   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DATA REDUCTION; PERSONNEL TRAINING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA; EARTHQUAKE LOSSES; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC SOURCE;

EARTHQUAKES;

EID: 29544445673     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2083907     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bakun, W. H., and Hopper, M. G., 2004. Magnitudes and locations of the 1811-1812 New Madrid, Missouri, and the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 64-75.
2. Bollinger, G. A., 1977. Reinterpretation of the intensity data for the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, in Studies Related to the Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake of 1886: A Preliminary Report, edited by D. W. Rankin, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1028, pp. 17-32.
3. Bollinger, G. A., Johnston, A. C., Talwani, P., Long, L. T., Shedlock, K. M., Sibol, M. S., and Chapman, M. C., 1991. Seismicity of the southeastern United States; 1698 to 1986, in Neotectonics of North America, edited by D. B. Slemmons, E. R. Engdahl, M. D. Zoback, and D. Blackwell, Geological Society of America, Decade Map Volume I, pp. 291-308.
4. Bouabid, J., Wong, I., Bureau, G., Graf, W., Huyck, C., Porush, A., Siegel, T., Silva, W., Swigart, M., Eguchi, R., Rouleau, J., Knight, J., and Dreher, T., 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part I - Overview and results, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings (CD-ROM).
5. Bureau, G., and Ballentine, G. D., 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part VI - Dam inventory and vulnerability assessment methodology, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings (CD-ROM).
6. Frankel, A., Peterson, M., Mueller, C., Haller, K., Wheeler, R., Leyendecker, E., Wesson, R., Harmsen, S., Cramer, C., Perkins, D., and Rukstales, K., 2002. Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420, 33 pp.
7. Graf, W., Porush, A., and Bouabid, J., 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part IV - Seismic vulnerability of building structures, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings (CD-ROM).
8. Huyck, C. K., Castner, L. L., Bouabid, J., and Eguchi, R. T., 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part V - Lifelines, essential facilities, and hazardous materials sites, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings (CD-ROM).
9. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), 1999. HAZUS: Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Technical Manuals I, II, & III, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
10. Siegel, T., Camp, W., Silva, W., Wong, I., Wright, D., and O'Brien, J., 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part III - Liquefaction hazard, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings (CD-ROM).
11. Silva, W., Wong, I., Siegel, T., Gregor, N., Darragh, R., and Lee, R., 2003. Ground motion and liquefaction simulation of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc.Am. 93, 2717-2736.
12. Silva, W., Wong, I., Siegel, T., Gregor, N., Wright, D., Schapiro, R., Lee, R., and Talwani, P., 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part II - Ground motion hazard, 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings (CD-ROM).
13. Stover, C. W., and Coffman, J. L., 1993. Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised), U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, 415 pp.
14. Wilson, R. C., and Keefer, D. K., 1985. Predicting areal limits of earthquake-induced landsliding, in Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region: An Earth Science Perspective, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360, edited by J. I. Ziony, pp. 317-345.
15. Youd, T. L., and Perkins, D. M., 1978. Mapping liquefaction-induced ground failure potential, J. Geotech. Eng. Div., ASCE, 104, 433-446.