Prospective study of contrast sensitivity and visual effects after LASIK;Étude prospective de la sensibilité au contraste et des effets visuels après LASIK

Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1070-1075

  Donate, D ^a   Denis, P ^a   Burillon, C ^a  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Glare; Halos; LASIK; Visual effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VISION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; ADULT; FEMALE; MALE;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 29544445207     PISSN: 01815512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0181-5512(05)81140-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wilson TS. LASIK surgery. Aorn J, 2000;71:963-72.
2. Seiler T. latrogenic keratectasia: academic anxiety or serious risk? J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999;25:1307-8.
3. Piccoli PM, Gomes AA, Piccoli FV. Corneal ectasia detected 32 months after LASIK for correction of myopia and asymmetric astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003;29:1222-5.
4. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters. J Refract Surg, 1997;13:528-34.
5. Perez-Santonja JJ, Sakla HF, Alio JL. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998;24:183-9.
6. Mutyala S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA, Ostrick MD, Brint SF, Thompson H. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology, 2000;107:1864-7.
7. Nakamura K, Bissen-Miyajima H, Toda I, Hori Y, Tsubota K. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis correction on contrast visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001;27:357-61.
8. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg, 2001;17:646-51.
9. Chan JW, Edwards MH, Woo GC, Woo VC. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002;28:1774-9.
10. Sano Y, Carr JD, Takei K, Thompson KP, Stulting RD, Waring GO 3rd. Videokeratography after excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Ophthalmology, 2000;107:674-84.
11. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg, 2001;17:5596-601.
12. Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999;25:663-9.
13. Rani A, Balasubramanya R, Sharma N, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB, Dada VK, Singh R. Outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment in high myopes. J Refract Surg, 2003;19:159-64.
14. Anera RG, Jimenez JR, Jimenez del Barco L, Bermudez J, Hita E. Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003;29:762-8.
15. Lee YC, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis. Influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003;29:769-77.
16. Hammond SD Jr, Puri AK, Ambati BK. Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2004;15:328-32.
17. Jain S, Khoury JM, Chamon W, Azar DT. Corneal light scattering after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol, 1995;120:532-4.
18. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC, El Danasoury MA. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999;127:1-7.
19. Pallikaris IG. Quality of vision in refractive surgery. Barraquer Lecture 1997. J Refract Surg, 1998;14:549-58.
20. El Danasoury MA. Prospective bilateral study of night glare after laser in situ keratomileusis with single zone and transition zone ablation. J Refract Surg, 1998;14:512-6.
21. Anderson NJ, Edelhauser HF, Sharara N, Thompson KP, Rubinfeld RS, Devaney DM et al. Histologic and ultrastructural findings in human corneas after successful laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol, 2002;120:288-93.
22. Amm M, Wetzel W, Winter M, Uthoff D, Duncker GI. Histopathological comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits. J Refract Surg, 1996;12:758-66.
23. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg, 2001;17:5596-601.
24. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, Siganos CS, Theodorakis MA, Pallikaris AI. Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002;28:1737-41.
25. Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, Grinbaum A. Contrast sensitivity after wave front guided LASIK. Ophthalmology, 2004;111:454-7.
26. Roberts TV, Lawless MA, Rogers CM, Sutton GL, Domniz Y. The effect of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on retinal nerve fiber layer measurements obtained with scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma, 2002;11:173-6.
27. Bushley DM, Parmley VC, Paglen P. Visual field defect associated with laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol, 2000;129:668-71.
28. Weiss HS, Rubinfeld RS, Anderschat JF. Case reports and small case series: LASIK-associated visual field loss in a glaucoma suspect. Arch Ophthalmol, 2001;119:774-5.
29. Shaikh NM, Shaikh S, Singh K, Manche E. Progression to end-stage glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002;28:356-9.