Complex de novo cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements in a fetus with multiple ultrasonographic abnormalities and a normal karyotype at amniocentesis

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1142-1149

  Iqbal, M Anwar ^a   Ramadan, Sahar ^a   Al Ali, Faten ^a   Kurdi, Wesam ^a  

^a KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Cryptic rearrangements; Fetal abnormalities; FISH; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; AMNIOTIC FLUID CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CHROMOSOME 4P; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYPTIC SUBTELOMERIC REARRANGEMENT; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DNA PROBE; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS; FETUS DISEASE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KARYOTYPE 46,XY; LYMPHOCYTE; PARENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELOMERE;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; FATAL OUTCOME; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; GENE REARRANGEMENT; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; PREGNANCY; TELOMERE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 29544438716     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1290     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Astbury C, Christ LA, Aughton DJ. et al. 2004. Delineation of complex chromosomal rearrangements: evidence for increased complexity. Hum Genet 114: 448-457.
2. Ballif BC, Kashorr CD, Shaffer LG. 2000. Fishing for mechanisms of cytogenetically defined terminal deletions using chromosome-specific subtelomeric probes. Eur J Hum Genet 8: 764-770.
3. Cotter PD, Musci TJ. 2001. Interphase FISH with chromosome-specific protelomere probes for rapid prenatal diagnosis in a reciprocal translocation carrier. Prenat Diagn 21: 171-175.
4. Davies AF, Kirby TL, Docherty Z, Ogilvie CM. 2003. Characterization of terminal chromosome anomalies using multisubtelomere FISH. Am J Med Genet 120A: 483-489.
5. Flint J, Wilkie AO, Buckle VJ, Winter RM, Holland AJ, McDermid HE. 1995. The detection of subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation. Nat Genet 9: 132-140.
6. Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR (eds). 1996. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. Oxford University Press: New York.
7. Goumy C, Bonnet-Dupeyron MN, Cherasse Y. et al. 2004. Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for a rapid first-trimester prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 24: 249-256.
8. Hsu L. 1988. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome analysis. In Genetic Disorders and the Fetus, 2nd edn, Milunsky A (ed.). Plenum Press: New York; 115-183.
9. Karolchik D, Baertsch R, Diekhans M. et al. 2003. The UCSC genome browser database. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 51-54.
10. Kausch K, Haaf T, Kohler J, Schmid M. 1988. Complex chromosomal rearrangement in a woman with multiple miscarriages. Am J Med Genet 31: 415-420.
11. Kilby MD, Brackley KJ, Walters JJ, Morton J, Roberts E, Davison EV. 2001. First-trimester prenatal diagnosis of a familial subtelomeric translocation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17: 531-533.
12. Kleczkowska A, Fryns JP, van den Berghe H. 1982. Complex chromosomal rearrangements and their genetic consequences. J Genet Hum 30: 199-214.
13. Knight SJ, Regan R, Nilod A. et al. 1999. Subtle chromosome rearrangements in children with unexplained mental retardation. Lancet 354: 1676-1681.
14. Kumar A, Becker LA, Depinet TW. et al. 1998. Molecular characterization and delineation of subtle deletions in de novo "balanced" chromosomal rearrangements. Hum Genet 103: 173-178.
15. Ledbetter DH, Martin AO, Verlinsky Y. et al. 1990. Cytogenetic results of chorionic villus sampling high success rate and diagnostic accuracy in the United States collaborative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162: 495-501.
16. Madan K, Nieuwint AW, Bever Y, van Bever Y. 1997. Recombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the child. Review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations. Hum Genet 99: 806-815.
17. Mefford HC, Trask BJ. 2002. The complex structure and dynamic evolution of human subtelomeres. Nat Rev Genet 3: 91-102.
18. Ott WJ, Taysi K. 2001. Obstetric ultrasonographic findings and fetal chromosomal abnormalities: refining the association. J Obstet Gynecol 184: 1414-1420.
19. Pai GS, Thomas GH, Mahoney W, Migeon BR. 1980. Complex chromosome rearrangements: report of a new case and literature review. Clin Genet 18: 436-444.
20. Pettenati MJ, Von Kap-Herr C, Jackle B. et al. 2002. Rapid interphase analysis for prenatal diagnosis of translocation carriers using subtelomeric probes. Prenat Diagn 22: 193-197.
21. Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schlesselman SE. et al. 1989. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 320: 609-617.
22. Rodriguez-Revenga L, Badenas C, Sanchez A. et al. 2004. Cryptic chromosomal rearrangement screening in 30 patients with mental retardation and dysmorphic features. Clin Genet 65: 17-23.
23. Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN. et al. 2001. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 21: 293-301.
24. Witters I, Devriendt K, Legius E. et al. 2002. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Prenat Diagn 22: 29-33.