Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: A pilot study

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 721-726

  Culbert, A ^a   Davis, Deborah J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b Center for Clinical Education   (Denmark)

^c Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEWBORN CARE; OBSTETRIC CARE; PARENTAL CONSENT; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RESUSCITATION; SOCIAL STATUS;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MOTHERS; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESUSCITATION; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 29544436080     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.011247     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Mason SA, Allmark PJ, for the Euricon Study Group. Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomized controlled trials: Interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet 2000;356:2045-51.
2. Zupancic JAF, Gillie P, Streiner DL, et al. Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials. Pediatrics 1997;99:e6.
3. Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, et al. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Newborn Ed 2003;88:F280-5.
4. Low JA. Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30:276-86.
5. Mason S A. Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomized controlled trials - an "elaborate ritual"? Arch Dis Child 1997;76:F143-5.
6. Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, et al. Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent. Can Med Assoc J 1996;155:177-80.
7. Abramson NS, Safar P. Deferred consent: Use in clinical resuscitation research. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:781-4.
8. Saugstad OD, Rootwelt T, Aalen O. Resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn infants with room air or oxygen: an international controlled trial: the Resair 2 study. Pediatrics 1998;102:e1.
9. Miller BL. The ethics of cardiac arrest research. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:188-24.
10. Biros MH, Lewis RJ, Olson CM, et al. Informed consent in emergency research. JAMA 1995;273:1283-7.
11. Spivey WH, Abramson NS, Iserson KV, et al. Informed consent for biomedical research in acute care medicine. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1251-65.
12. US Food and Drug Administration Dept of Health and Human Services. Protection of human subjects: informed consent. Federal Register 1995;60:49086-103.
13. Zelen M. Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: An update. Stat Med 1990;9:645-56.
14. Allmark P. Should Zelen pre-randomized consent designs be used in some neonatal trials? J Med Ethics 1999;25:325-9.
15. Rogers CG, Tyson JE, Kennedy KA, et al. Conventional consent with opting in versus simplified consent with opting out: An exploratory trial for studies that do not increase patient risk. J Pediatr 1998;132:606-11.
16. Mutch L, King R. Obtaining parental consent-opting in or opting out? Arch Dis Child 1985;60:979-80.
17. Manning DJ. Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research. J Med Ethics 2000;26:249-53.