Design strategy for a simultaneous nitrification/denitrification of a slaughterhouse wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor: ASM2d modeling and verification

Environmental Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1081-1100

  Filali Meknassi, Y ^a,d   Auriol, M ^a   Tyagi, R D ^a   Comeau, Y ^b   Surampalli, R Y ^c  

^a CENTRE EAU TERRE ENVIRONNEMENT   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^d MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

ASM2d model; Calibration; Nitrification denitrification; Performance of SBR system

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BATCH REACTORS; BIOINFORMATICS; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; NITRIFICATION; NITROGEN REMOVAL; SODIUM COMPOUNDS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL; CALIBRATION AND VALIDATIONS; MODELING AND VERIFICATIONS; NITRIFICATION/DENITRIFICATION; SBR SYSTEM; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SIMULTANEOUS NITRIFICATION/DENITRIFICATION; SLAUGHTERHOUSE WASTEWATER;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

ACETIC ACID; NITROGEN; ORGANIC MATTER; OXYGEN;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DENITRIFICATION; NITRIFICATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CARBON SOURCE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DENITRIFICATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METHODOLOGY; NITRIFICATION; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; RESPIROMETRY; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SLAUGHTERHOUSE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 29544435096     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593332608618478     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bull M. A., Sterritt R. M. and Lester J. N., The treatment of wastewaters from the meat industry: A review. Environ. Technol. Lett., 3, 117-126 (1982).
2. Massé D. I. and Masse L., Characterization of wastewater from hog slaughterhouses in Eastern Canada and evaluation of their in-plant wastewater treatment systems. Can. Agicr. Eng., 42, 139-146 (2000).
3. Metzner G. and Temper U., Operation and optimization of a full-scale fixed-bed reactor for anaerobic digestion of animal rendering wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 22, 373-384 (1990).
4. Frose G. and Kayser R., Effective treatment of wastewater from rendering plants. In: Proc. 40th Purdue Ind. Waste Conf., Butterworths, Boston, pp. 69-77 (1985).
5. Wang J. H., Baltzis B. C. and Lewandowski G. A., Fundamental denitrification kinetic studies with Pseudomonas denitrificans. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 47, 26-41 (1995).
6. Timmermans P. and van Haute A., Denitrification with methanol. Water Res., 17, 1249-1255 (1983).
7. Purtschert I. and Gujer W., Population dynamics by methanol addition in denitrifying wastewater treatment plants. Water. Sci. Technol., 39, 43-50 (1999).
8. Lee Y. W. and Daheb M. F., Kinetics of low solids bio-denitrification of water supplies. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 60, 1857-1861 (1988).
9. Almeida J. S., Reis M. A. M. and Carrondo M. J. T., Competition between nitrate and nitrite reduction in denitrification by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 46, 476-484 (1995).
10. Huang H. K. and Tseng S. K., Nitrate reduction by Citrobacter diversus under aerobic environment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 55, 90-94 (2001).
11. Christensson M., Lie E. and Welander T., A comparison between ethanol and methanol as carbon sources for denitrification. Water Sci. Technol., 30, 83-90 (1994).
12. Munch E., Lant P. and Keller J., Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in bench scale sequencing batch reactors. Water Res., 30, 277-284 (1996).
13. Isaacs S. H., Henze M., Soeberg H. and Kuemmel M., External carbon source addition as a means to control an activated sludge nutrient. Water Res., 28, 51-520 (1994).
14. Isaacs S. H. and Henze M., Controlled carbon source addition to an alternating nitrification-denitrification wastewater treatment process including biological P removal. Water Res., 29, 77-89 (1995).
15. Filali-Meknassi Y. and Tyagi R. D., Recent advances in the removal of CNP in activated sludge process: an overview. Res. Adv. Water Res., 2, 45-63 (2002).
16. Levine J. S., Water and the photochemistry of the troposphere. In: Satellite Sensing of a Cloudy Atmosphere: Observing the Third Planet. Handerson-Sellers A. (ed.), Tayoler & Francis, Ltd., London, pp. 123-166 (1984).
17. 2O: the role of soils and their change. Sci. Total Environ., 55, 27-38 (1986).
18. Zayed G. and Winter J., Removal of organic pollutants and of nitrate from wastewater from dairy industry by denitrification. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 49, 469-474 (1998).
19. Peyton B. M., Mormile M. R. and Petersen J. N., Nitrate reduction with Halomonas Campisalis: kinetics of denitrification at pH 9 and 12.5% NaCl. Water Res., 35, 4237-4242 (2001).
20. Irvine R. L., Fox T. P. and Richter R. O., Investigation of fill and batch periods of sequencing batch biological reactors. Water Res., 11, 713-717 (1977).
21. Silverstein J. and Schroeder E. D., Performance of activated sludge process with nitrification/denitrification. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 55, 377-384 (1983).
22. Surampalli R. Y., Tyagi R. D., Scheible O. K. and Heidman J. A., Nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal in sequential batch reactors. Bioresour. Technol., 61, 151-157 (1997).
23. Filali-Meknassi Y., Auriol M., Tyagi R. D. and Surampalli R. Y., Treatment of slaughter house wastewater in a Sequencing Batch Reactor: simulation vs experimental studies. Environ. Technol., 25, 23-38 (2003).
24. APHA, AWWA and WEF, Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. (1992).
25. Kristensen G. H., Jorgensen P. E. and Henze M., Characterization of functional microorganism groups and substrate in activated sludge and wastewater by AUR, NUR and OUR. Water Sci. Technol., 25, 43-57 (1992).
26. Mercel, H., Methods for Wastewater Characterization in activated Sludge Modeling. Water Environment Federation; IWA Publishing, London, (2003).
27. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T. and van Loosdrecht M., Activated sludge model No 2d, ASM2d. Water Sci. Technol., 39, 165-182 (1999).
28. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T. and Loosdrecht M. C. M., Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Scientific and Technical Report, No.9, IWA Publishing, London, (2000).
29. Mino T., San Pedro D. C., Yamamoto S. and Matsuo T., Application of the IAWQ activated sludge model to nutrient removal process. Water Sci. Technol., 35, 111-118 (1997).
30. Doyle J., Watts S., Solley D. and Keller J., Exceptionally high-rate nitrification in sequencing batch reactors treating high ammonia landfill leachate. Water Sci. Technol., 43, 315-322 (2001).
31. Martienssen M. and Schöps R., Population dynamics of denitrifying bacteria in a model biocommunity. Water Res., 33, 639-646 (1999).
32. Folgar L. and Briski F., Wastewater denitrifcation process - the influence of methanol and kinetic analysis. Process Biochem., 39, 95-103 (2002).
33. Boisson C., Enlèvement des nutriments d'un effluent agro-alimentaire par procédé combiné biologique-chimique. Master's Thesis. École polytechnique de Montréal, Canada (2000).
34. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., Matsuo T., Wentzel M. C. and Marais G. v. R., Wastewater and biomass characterization for the activated sludge model No.2: biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol., 31, 13-23 (1995).
35. Ministère de l'environnement et de la faune (MEQ), 25 ans d'assainissement des eaux usées industrielles au Québec. Gouvernement du Québec, Quebec, Canada (1999).
36. Stern L. B. and Marais G. v. R., Sewage as Electron Donor in Biological Denitrification. Research report No 7, Department of civil engineering, University of Cape Town, South Africa pp. 1-300 (1974).
37. Marsden M. G. and Marais G. v. R., The Role of Primary Anoxic Reactor in Denitrification and Biological Phosphorus Removal. Research report No 19, Department of civil engineering, University of Cape Town, South Africa (1976).
38. Henze M. and Harremoes P., Chemical-biological nutrient removal-The HYPRO concept. In: Hahn and H.H. Klute, R. (eds.) Chemical water and wastewater treatment. Proc. from 4th Gothenburg Symposium, 1-3 October, Madrid, Espagne Spring-Verlag, Berlin. 499-510 (1990).
39. Henze M. and Harremoes P., Characterisation of wastewater: the effect of chemical precipitation on the wastewater composition and its consequences for biological denitrification. In: Klute, R. and Hahn, H.H. (eds.), Chemical water and wastewater treatment 2. Proc. of the 5th Gothenburg Symposium, September 28-30, Nice, France, Spring-Verlag, Berlin. 299-311, (1992).
40. Nyberg U., Aspegren H., Andersson B., Jansen J. and Villadsen I. S., Full-scale application of nitrogen removal with methanol as carbon source. Water Sci. Technol., 26, 1077-1086 (1992).
41. Sözen S. and Orhon D., The effect of nitrite correction on the evaluation of the rate of nitrate utilization under anoxic conditions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 74, 790-800 (1999).
42. Carucci A., Ramadori R., Rosseti S. and Tomei M. C., Kinetics of denitrification reactions in single sludge systems. Water Res., 30, 51-56 (1996).
43. Knowles R., Denitrification. Microbiol. Rev., 46, 43-70 (1982).
44. Simpkin T. J. and Boyle W. C., The lack of repression by oxygen of the denitrifying enzymes in activated sludge. Water Res., 22, 201-206 (1988).
45. Oles J. and Wilderer P. A., Computer aided design of sequencing batch reactors based on the IAWPRC activated sludge model. Water Sci. Technol., 23, 1087-1095 (1991).
46. Watanabe S., Baba K. and Nogita S., Basic studies of an ORP/external carbon source control system for the biological denitrification process. Instrumentation and Control of Water and Wastewater Treatment and Transport Systems. In: Proc. 4th IAWPRC Workshop, Denver, Colo, pp. 641-648 (1985).
47. Peddie C. C., Koch F. A., Jenkins C. J. and Mavinic D. S., ORP as a tool for monitoring and control of SBR systems for aerobic sludge digestion. In: Proc. Joint ASCE/CSCE Envir. Eng. Conf., CSCE, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, pp. 171-178 (1988).
48. Charpentier J., Florentz M. and David G., Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) regulation: a way to optimize pollution removal and energy savings in the low load activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol., 19, 645 (1987).
49. Charpentier J., Godart H., Martin C. and Mogno Y., Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) regulation as a way to optimize aeration and C, N, and P removal: experimental basis and various full-scale examples. Water. Sci. Technol., 21, 1209-1218 (1989).
50. Jenkins C. J. and Mavinic D. S., Anoxic-aerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: part II-Supernatant characteristics, ORP monitoring results and overall rating system. Environ. Technol. Lett., 10, 371-384 (1989).
51. Peddie C. C., Mavinic D. S. and Jenkins C. J., Use of ORP for monitoring and control of aerobic sludge digestion. J. Environ. Eng., ASCE, 116, 461-471 (1990).
52. de la Menardiere M., Charpentier J., Vachon A. and Martin G., ORP as a control parameter in a single sludge biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal activated sludge system. Water SA, 17, 123-130 (1991).
53. Lo C. K., Yu C. W., Tam N. F. Y. and Traynor S., Enhanced nutrient removal by oxidation reduction potential (ORP) controlled aeration in a laboratory scale extended aeration treatment system. Water Res., 28, 2087-2094 (1994).
54. Wareham D. G., Hall K. J. and Mavinic D. S., Real-time control of aerobic-anoxic sludge digestion using ORP. Can. J. Civ. Eng., 22, 260-269 (1994).
55. Ekama G. A., Dold P. L. and Marais G. V. R., Pocedures for determining influent COD fractions and the maximum specific growth rate of heterotrophs in activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol., 18, 91-114 (1986).
56. Sollfrank U., Bedeutung organischer Fraktionen in kommunalem Abwasser in Hinblick auf die mathematische Modellierung von Belebtschlammsystemen. Dissertation ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (1988).
57. Görgün E., Çokgör E. U., Orhon D., Germirli F. and Artan N., Modeling biological treatability for meat processing effluent. Water Sci. Technol., 32, 43-52 (1995).
58. Brjanovic D., van Loosdrecht M. C. M., Versteeg P., Hooijmans C. M., Alaerts G. J. and Heijnen J. J., Modeling COD, N and P removal in a full-scale WWTP Haarlem Waarderpolder. Water Res., 34, 846-858 (2000).
59. Hu Z. R., Wentzel M. C. and Ekama G. A., External nitrification in biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems. Water SA, 26 (2), 225-238 (2000).
60. Fang H. H. P., Yeong C. L. Y., Book K. M. and Chiu C. M., Removal of COD and nitrogen in wastewater using sequencing batch reactor with fibrous packing. Water Sci. Technol., 28, 125-131 (1993).
61. Bortone G., Gemelli S., Rambaldi A. and Tilche A., Nitrification, denitrification and biological removal in sequencing batch reactors treating piggery wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 26, 977-985 (1992).
62. Comeau Y., La déphosphatation biologique - Procédés et conception. Sci. Technol. Eau, 23, 199-216 (1990).
63. U.S.EPA, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Technology: Recent Developments. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, NJ 250 p. (1993).
64. Lesouef A., Payraudeau M., Rogalla F. and Kleiber B., Optimizing nitrogen removal reactor configuration of the IAWPRC activated sludge model. Water Sci. Technol., 25, 105-123 (1992).