Soil and winegrape quality in biodynamically and organically managed vineyards

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 367-376

  Reeve, Jennifer R ^a   Carpenter Boggs, L ^a   Reganold, John P ^a   York, Alan L ^b   McGourty, Glenn ^c   McCloskey, Leo P ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Wholistic Estate Management   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION   (United States)

^d Enologix   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodynamic viticulture; Organic farming; Soil quality; Winegrape quality

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS SP.;

EID: 29544434969     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, J.P.E., and K.H. Domsch. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10:215-221.
2. Bourguignon, C., and L. Gabucci. 2000. Comparisons of chemical analysis and biological activity of soils cultivated by organic and biodynamic methods. In IFOAM 2000: The World Grows Organic. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Organic Viticulture. H. Willer and U. Meier (Eds.), pp. 92-99. Stiftung Okologie & Landbau, Bad Dürkheim, Germany.
3. Campbell, A., and D. Fey. 2003. Soil management and grapevine nutrition. In Oregon Viticulture. E.W. Hellman. (Ed.), pp. 143-161, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
4. Carpenter-Boggs, L., J.P. Reganold, and A.C. Kennedy. 2000a. Biodynamic preparations: Short-term effects on crops, soils and weed populations. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 15:110-118.
5. Carpenter-Boggs, L., A.C. Kennedy, and J.P. Reganold. 2000b. Organic and biodynamic management: Effects on soil biology. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:1651-1659.
6. Carpenter-Boggs, L., J.P. Reganold, and A.C. Kennedy. 2000c. Effects of biodynamic preparations on compost development. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 17:313-328.
7. Caspari, H. 1997. Sustainable viticulture: Current world trends. HortResearch Publication, Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand. http://www.hortnet.co.nz/publications/science/c/caspari/viti.htm (accessed 10 August 2004).
8. Colmenares, R., and J.M. de Miguel. 1999. Improving permanent pasture's growth: An organic approach. Cahiers Options Méditer. 39:189-191.
9. Conradie, W.J. 2005. Partitioning of mineral nutrients and timing of fertilizer applications for optimum efficiency. In Proceedings of the Soil Environment and Vine Mineral Nutrition Symposium. P. Christensen and D. Smart (Eds.), pp. 69-81. American Society for Enology and Viticulture, Davis, CA.
10. Dupin, I., U. Fischer, and P. Schlich. 2000. Differentiation of wines produced by organic or conventional viticulture according to their sensory and profiles and aroma composition. Abstr. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51:299.
11. Edwards, C.A., and J.R. Lofty. 1977. Biology of Earthworms. Halsted Press, New York.
12. Gehlen, P., J. Neu, and D. Schröder. 1988. Soil chemical and soil biological properties of conventionally and organically managed vineyards at the Mosel River. Wein Wissen. 43:161-173.
13. Goldstein, W. 1986. Alternative crops, rotations and management systems for the Palouse. Ph.D. dissertation. Washington State University, Pullman.
14. Green, C. 2003. USDA Organic Farming Statistics and Social Science Research. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
15. Henick-Kling, T. 1995. Summary of effects of organic and conventional grape production practices on juice and wine composition. Special report, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva. 69:67-75.
16. Kemper, W.D., and R.C. Rosenau. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2d ed. A. Klute (Ed.), pp. 425-442. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
17. Kliewer, W.M., and T. Casteel. 2003. Canopy management. In Oregon Viticulture. E.W. Hellman (Ed.), pp. 177-184. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
18. Koepf, H.H. 1993. Research in Biodynamic Agriculture: Methods and Results. Bio-Dynamic Farming and Gardening Assn., Kimberton, PA.
19. Koepf, H.H., B.D. Pettersson, and W. Schaumann. 1990. Biodynamic Agriculture an Introduction: Practical Applications of the Bio-Dynamic Method. Anthroposophic Press, Hudson, NY.
20. Lotter, D.W., J.Granett, and A.D. Omer. 1999. Differences in grape phylloxera-related grapevine root damage in organically and conventionally managed vineyards in California. HortScience 34:1108-1111.
21. Mäder, P., A. Fleissbach, D. Dubois, L. Gunst, P. Fried, and U. Niggli. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694-1697.
22. McGourty, G.T., R. Elkins, S. Tylicki, and J. Nosera. 2001. An evaluation of 7 Cabernet Sauvignon clones in Lake County. Report for the Lake County Wine Grape Commission, University of California at Davis. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/ files/filelibrary/1524/5356.pdf (accessed 10 Aug 2004).
23. Meunier, M. 2001. Biodynamic wine and its progress in different countries. Aust. Grapegr. Winem. 444:77-78.
24. Neuhoff, D., D.G. Schulz, and U. Köpke. 1999. Yield and quality of potato tubers: Effects of different intensity and kind of manuring (biodynamic or organic). In Organic Agriculture: The Credible Solution for the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 12th International IFOAM Scientific Conference. D. Foguelman and W. Lockeretz (Eds.), pp. 142-146. IFOAM, Tholey-Theley, Germany.
25. Nguyen, M.L., R.J. Hayes, and K.M. Goh. 1995. Nutrient budgets and status in three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 52:149-162.
26. Ough, C.S., and M.A. Amerine. 1988. Methods for Analysis of Musts and Wines. Wiley & Sons, New York.
27. Penfold, C.M., M.S. Miyan, T.G. Reeves, and T. Grierson. 1995. Biological farming for sustainable agricultural production. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 35:849-856.
28. Pettersson, B.D., H.J. Reents, and E. von Wistinghausen. 1992. Düngung und Bodeneigenschaften: Ergebnisse eines 32-jährigen Feldversuches in Järna, Schweden. Institut für Biologischdynamische Forschung, Darmstadt, Germany.
29. Raupp, J., and U.J. König. 1996. Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 13:175-188.
30. Reganold, J.P. 1988. Comparison of soil properties as influenced by organic and conventional farming systems. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 3:144-155.
31. Reganold, J.P. 1995. Soil quality and profitability of biodynamic and conventional farming systems: A review. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 10:36-44.
32. Reganold, J.P., A.S. Palmer, J.C. Lockhart, and A.N. Macgregor. 1993. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344-349.
33. Schmidt, E.L., and L.W. Belser. 1994. Autotrophic nitrifying bacteria. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. R.W. Weaver et al. (Eds.), pp. 159-177. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
34. Sims, J.T., and A. Wolf (Eds.). 1995. Recommended Soil Testing Procedures. Northeast Regional Publication. Bulletin 493. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Delaware, Newark.
35. Steiner, R. 1993. Agriculture: Spiritual Foundations for the Renewal of Agriculture. Anthroposophic Press, Hudson, NY.
36. Tabatabai, M.A. 1994. Soil enzymes. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. R.W. Weaver et al (Eds.), pp. 775-833. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
37. WSALPT. 1997. Western States Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program Soil and Plant Analytical Methods, Version 4.00. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
38. Wulf, L.W., and C.W. Nagel. 1978. High-pressure liquid chromatographic separation of anthocyanins of Vitis vinifera. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 24:42-49.