Judgment of disfluency in people who stutter and people who do not stutter: Results from magnitude estimation

Language and Speech

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 299-312

  Lickley, Robin J ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^b   Corley, Martin ^c   Russell, Melanie ^a   Nelson, Ruth ^a  

^a QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disfluency; Judgment; Self monitoring; Stuttering

Indexed keywords

EID: 29544433474     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00238309050480030301     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ADAMS, F. R., FREEMAN, F. J., & CONTURE, E. (1985). Laryngeal dynamics of stutterers. In R. F. Curlee & W. H. Perkins (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
2. ADAMS, F. R., & RUNYAN, C. M.(1981). Stuttering and fluency: Exclusive events or points on a continuum? Journal of Fluency Disorders, 6, 197-218.
3. ANDERSON, A. H., BADER, M., BARD, E., BOYLE, E., DOHERTY, G., GARROD, S., ISARD, S., KOWTKO, J., McALLISTER, J., MILLER, C., SOTILLO, C., THOMPSON, H., & WEINERT, R. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech, 34, 351-366.
4. BARD, E., ROBERTSON, D., & SORACE, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72, 32-68.
5. BURGER, R., & WIJNEN, F. (1999). Phonological encoding and word stress in stuttering and non-stuttering subjects. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 24, 91-106.
6. CONTURE, E. G. (1991). Stuttering: Its nature, diagnosis and treatment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7. DAYALU, V. N., & KALINOWSKI, J. (2002). Pseudofluency in adults who stutter: The illusory outcome of therapy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94(1), 87-96.
8. DELL, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
9. FINN, P., & INGHAM, R. J. (1989). The selection of "fluent" samples in research on stuttering: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 401-418.
10. HARTSUIKER, R. J., & KOLK, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113-157.
11. HARTSUIKER, R. J., KOLK, H. H. J., & LICKLEY, R. J. (2005). Stuttering on function words and content words: A computational test of the Covert Repair hypothesis. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 261-280). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
12. th International Speech Motor Conference (pp.316-321). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Vantilt.
13. KELLER, F., & ALEXOPOLOU, T. (2001). Phonology competes with syntax: Experimental evidence for the interaction of word order and accent placement in the realization of information structure. Cognition, 79, 301-372.
14. KOLK, H. H. J. (1991). Is stuttering a symptom of adaptation or of impairment? In Peters, H. F. M., Hulstijn, W., & Starkweather, C. W. (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Excerpta Medica.
15. KOLK, H. H. J., & POSTMA, A. (1997). Stuttering as a covert-repair phenomenon. In: R. Corlee & G. Siegel (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (pp. 182-203). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
17. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
18. LEVELT, W. J. M., & WHEELDON, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
19. LICKLEY, R. J. (1998). HCRC Disfluency Coding Manual. HCRC Technical Report. HCRC/TR-100
20. MELNICK, K. S., CONTURE, E. G., & OHDE, R. N. (2005). Phonological encoding in young children who stutter. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 102-118). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
21. MEYER, A. S. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 524-545.
22. MEYER, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69-89.
23. NOOTEBOOM, S. G. (2005). Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 167-186). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
24. POSTMA, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131.
25. POSTMA, A., & KOLK, H. H. J. (1992). The effects of noise masking and required accuracy on speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 537-544.
26. POSTMA, A., & KOLK, H. H. J. (1993). The Covert Repair hypothesis: Prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 472-487.
27. POSTMA, A., KOLK, H. H. J., & POVEL, D. J. (1990). On the relation among speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs. Language and Speech, 33, 19-29.
28. SCHIAVETTI, N., SACCO, P. R., METZ, D. E., & SITLER, R. W. (1983). Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of stuttering severity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 568-573.
29. SHERRARD, C. A. (1975). Stuttering as false alarm responding. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 10, 83-91.
30. TUTHILL, C. (1940). A quantitative study of extensional meaning with special reference to stuttering. Journal of Speech Disorders, 5, 189-191.
31. Van LIESHOUT, P., PETERS, H., STARKWEATHER, C. W., & HULSTIJN, W. (1993). Physiological differences between stuttererers and nonstutterers in perceptually fluent speech: EMG amplitude and duration. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 55-63.
32. VASIĆ, N., & WIJNEN, F. (2001). Stuttering and speech monitoring. Proceedings of DISS 2001 29-31 August 2001, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp. 13-17.
33. VASIĆ, N., & WIJNEN, F. N. K. (2005). Stuttering as a monitoring deficit. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 226-247). Hove: Psychology Press.
34. WIJNEN, F. N. K. (2000). Stotteren als resultaat van inadequate spraakmonitoring [Stuttering as the result of inadequate speech monitoring]. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologle, 9, 211-230.
35. WIJNEN, F. N. K., & BOERS, I. (1994). Phonological priming effects in stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 19, 1-20.
36. WINGATE, M. (1988). The structure of stuttering. New York: Springer.
37. WOOD, S. (1995). An electropalatographic analysis of stutterers' speech. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 226-236.
38. YARUSS., S. (1999). Utterance length, syntactic complexity and childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42(2), 329-344.