Patchy distribution fields: An interleaved survey design and reconstruction adequacy

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 110, Issue 1-3, 2005, Pages 203-215

  Kalikhman, I ^a  

^a ISRAEL OCEANOGRAPHIC AND LIMNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Israel)

Author keywords

Acoustic survey; Adequacy; Anisotropy; Autocorrelation radius; Coefficient of determination; Design; Efficiency; Interleaved survey; Mathematical simulation; Patch; Reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; FISHERIES; LAKES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ACOUSTIC SURVEY; AUTOCORRELATION RADIUS; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; INTERLEAVED SURVEY; PATCHY DISTRIBUTION FIELDS;

MARINE BIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC SURVEY; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FISH; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION (SPECIES); MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; DATA COLLECTION; DEMOGRAPHY; FISHES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANKTON;

EID: 29444460172     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-6687-x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. N. A. C. Cressie 1991 Statistics for Spatial Data Wiley New York pp. 900
2. F. E. Croxton D. J. Cowden and S. Klein 1968 Applied General Statistics Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons London pp. 754
3. Gandin, L. S.: 1965. Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields (Translated from Russian), Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 242 pp.
4. Kalikhman, I.: 2001, 'Patchy distribution fields: Sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy' ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58, 1184-1194. 10.1006/ jmsc.2001.1106
5. Kalikhman, I.: 2002a, 'Patchy distribution fields: A zigzag survey design and reconstruction adequacy', Environ. Monit. Assess. 76, 275-289. 10.1023/A:1015536131255
6. Kalikhman, I.: 2002b, 'Patchy distribution fields: Sampling distance unit of a zigzag survey and reconstruction adequacy', Environ. Monit. Assess. 80 (1), 1-16. 10.1023/A:1020350214466
7. I. Kalikhman 2004 Patchy Distribution Fields: Acoustic Survey Design and Reconstruction Adequacy, in: G. Bruce Wiersma (ed) Environmental Monitoring CRC Press Boca Raton pp. 465-498
8. Kalikhman, I. and Ostrovsky, I.: 1997, 'Patchy distribution fields: Survey design and adequacy of reconstruction' ICES J. Mar. Sci. 54, 809-818. 10.1006/jmsc.1996.0205
9. Kizner, Z. I., Tesler, W. D. and Zaripov, B. R.: 1983, Methodological Recommendations on Mathematical Simulation of Commercial Concentrations and Treatment of Survey Data with Computers, Moscow, VNIRO, 44 pp. (in Russian).
10. D. N. MacLennan and E. J. Simmonds 1992 Fisheries Acoustics Chapmen & Hall London pp. 325
11. Rose, G. A. and Leggett, W.: 1990, 'The importance of scale to predator-prey spatial correlations: An example of Atlantic fishes', Ecology 71 (1), 33-43.
12. J. H. Steele 1976 Patchiness, in: D. H. Cushing and J. J. Walsh (eds) The Ecology of the Seas Blackwell London pp. 98-115
13. Thompson, S. K.: 1992, Sampling, Wiley, 335 pp.
14. Williamson, N. T.: 1980, Effect of Serial Correlation on Precision of Fish Abundance Estimates Derived from Quantitative Echo Sounder Survey, BIOMASS, Acoustic Krill Estimation Working Party News, Vol. 2, 16 pp.
15. Yudanov, K. I.: 1971, Interpretation of Echograms of Hydroacoustic Fish-Finding Instruments, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 120 pp. (Translated from Russian).
16. Zaripov, B. R., Kizner, Z. I. and Tesler, W. D.: 1983, The Analysis of Methods Used in the Treatment of Data Obtained in Echo Surveys by Means of a Mathematical Model of Moving Fish Aggregations, Fishery Acoustic Problems, Scientific Proceedings of VNIRO, pp. 25-36 (in Russian).