Using audiometric thresholds and word recognition in a treatment study

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 110-116

  Halpin, Chris ^a,b   Rauch, Steven D ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiometry; Hearing thresholds; Pure tone average; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COVARIANCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; WORD RECOGNITION;

AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HEARING LOSS, SUDDEN; HUMANS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; STEROIDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 29444448670     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200601000-00020     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Chen C, Halpin C, Rauch S. Oral steroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a ten year retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:728-33.
2. Thornton A, Raffin M. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:507-18.
3. Egan J. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 1948;58:955-91.
4. Hirsh I, Davis H, Silverman E, Reynolds E, Eldert E, Benson R. Development of materials for speech audiometry. In Chaiklin, J Ventry I, Dixon R, eds. Hearing Measurement: A Book of Readings. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1952:183-96.
5. Freeman M, Tukey J. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Statist 1950;21:607-11.
6. Hagerman B. Reliability in the determination of speech intelligibility. Scand Audiol 1976;5:219-28.
7. Elpern B. The relative stability of half list and full list discrimination tests. Laryngoscope 1961;71:30-6.
8. Studebaker G, Gray G, Branch W. Prediction and statistical evaluation of speech recognition test scores. J Am Acad Audiol 1999;10:355-70.