Agile software development: Human values and culture

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 36-42

  Miller, Keith W ^a   Larson, David K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; ENGINEERS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

AGILE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; DEONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; UTILITARIAN ANALYSIS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 29444447658     PISSN: 02780097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MTAS.2005.1563500     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ACM Computing Curriculum 2001: Appendix A: Body of Knowledge - Software Engineering, 2001: http://www.sigce.org/cc2001/SE.html./
2. P. Abrahamsson et al., Agile Software Methods: Review and Analysis. Espoo. Findland: Technical Research Center of Findland, VTT Publications. 2002, p. 478.
3. V. Basili and A.J. Turner, "Iterative enhancement: A practical technique for software development," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 1, no. 4, 1975.
4. K. Beck et al., Manifesto for Agile Software Development., 2001; http://agilemanifesto.org/.
5. J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London, U.K.: T. Payne, 1798.
6. W.R. Collins et al., "How good is good enough? An ethical analysis of software construction and use," Commun. ACM, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 81-91, 1994.
7. DOLCE Developing On and off-Line Computer Ethics, 2003;. http://csethics. uis.edu/dolce/, accessed Sept. 1, 2004.
8. H. Gallis et al., "An initial framework for research on pair programming," in Proc. 2003 Int. Symp. on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003, pp. 132-142.
9. E.F. Gehringer, "Ethics in computing," 2004;. http://legacy. ncsu.edu/classes-a/computer_ethics/; accessed Sept. 9, 2004.
10. F.S. Grodzinsky, "The practitioner from within: Revisiting the virtues," Computers and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 9-15, 1999.
11. B. Hanks et al., "Program quality with pair programming in CS1," in Proc. 9th Annual SIGCSE Conf., Leeds, UK, 2004, pp.176-180.
12. J. Highsmith, History: the Agile Manifesto, 2001; http://agilemanifesto. org/history.html, accessed Sept. 3, 2004.
13. D. Johnson, Computer Ethics, 3rd ed..Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.
14. I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Norman Kemp Smith, trans. New York, NY: St. Martin's, 1929.
15. K.C. Laudon and J.P. Laudon, Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004.
16. J.A. Lee, "Professionalism in computing digital library," Virginia Tech Department of Computer Science, 2001; http://courses.cs. vt.edu/professionalism/, accessed Sept. 6, 2004.
17. M. Lindvall et al., "Empirical findings in Agile Methods," in Proc. Extreme Programming and Agile Methods -XP/Agile Universe 2002, 2002, pp. 197-207.
18. J. Mill, Utilitarianism. London, England: Parker, Son, & Bourn., 1863.
19. K. Mackey, "Mars vs. Venus," IEEE Software, vol. 17, no. 3, pp.14-15, 2000.
20. W. Maner, Procedural Ethics, 2002; http://csweb.cs.bgsu.edu/maner/ heuristics/toc.htm, accessed Feb. 26, 2005.
21. J. Moor, "Reason, relativity and responsibility," Computers and Society, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 14-21, 1998.
22. G. Reynolds, "Ethics in information technology," Course Technology, 2003.
23. D. Sanders, "Student perceptions of the suitability of extreme and pair programming," in Extreme Programming Examined, M. Marchesi et al., Eds., Boston, MA: Addison Wesley, 2002, pp. 261-271.
24. R. Spinello, Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett, 2003.
25. Software Engineering Ethics Research Institute, Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice, 5.2, 1999; http://seeri.etsu. edu/Codes/TheSECode.htm#task%20force, accessed Sept. 1, 2004.
26. H. Tavani, Ed. Cyberethics Bibliography, 1996; http://cyberethics.cbi. msstate.edu/biblio/complete.htm, accessed Sept. 9, 2004.
27. L. Williams et al., "Strengthening the case for pair-programming," IEEE Software, vol. 17, pp. 19-25, 2000.