Ever users versus never users of a "less risky" cigarette

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 439-442

  Hughes, John R ^a,b   Keely, Josue P ^a,b   Callas, Peter W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Harm reduction; Smoking; Tobacco industry; Tobacco use cessation; Tobacco use disorder

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; TAR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RISK REDUCTION; SAFETY; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 29444444774     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.439     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Eclipse Expert Panel. (2000). A safer cigarette? A comparative study. A consensus report. Inhalation Toxicology, 12, 1-48.
2. Fagerstrom, K.-O., Kunze, M., Schoberberger, R., Breslau, N., Hughes, J. R., Hurt, R. D., et al. (1996). Nicotine dependence versus smoking prevalence: Comparisons among countries and categories of smokers. Tobacco Control, 5, 52-56.
3. Farrelly, M. C., Hund, L. M., St. Claire, A. W., Chou, R. H., & Haviland, M. L. (2003, December). Awareness and use of potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in a national sample. Poster presented at the National Conference on Tobacco or Health, Boston.
4. Hamilton, W. L., Ouellette, T. K., & Rhodes, W. M. (2001). Consumer responses to advertisements for potential reduced-exposure products. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
5. Hatsukami, D. K., Henningfield, J. E., & Kotlyar, M. (2004). Harm reduction approaches to reducing tobacco-related mortality. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 1-19.
6. Hughes, J. R. (2004). Data to estimate similarity of tobacco research samples to intended populations. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 6, 177-179.
7. Hughes, J. R., Keely, J. P., Fagerstrom, K.-O., & Callas, P. W. (2005). Intentions to quit smoking change over short periods of time. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 653-662.
8. Hughes, J. R., Keely, J., Niaura, R., Ossip-Klein, D., Richmond, R., & Swan, G. (2003). Measures of abstinence from tobacco in clinical trials: Issues and recommendations. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5, 13-25.
9. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Clearing the smoke: Assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236-1238.
11. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
12. Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J. L., Burton, S. L., & DiMarino, M. E. (2004). Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tobacco Control, 13, 78-84.
13. Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J. L., Burton, S. L., Rohay, J. M., & Gitchell, J. G. (2001). Smokers' beliefs about "light" and "ultra light" cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 10, 123-127.
14. Warner, K. E. (2003). Tobacco harm reduction: Promise and perils. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 3, S61-S71.
15. Wewers, M. E., Stillman, F. A., Hartmann, A. M., & Shopland, D. R. (2003). Distribution of daily smokers by stage of change: Current population survey results. Preventive Medicine, 36, 710-720.