Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ values as additional indicators to measure observer agreement [2]

Radiology

Volumn 232, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 302-303

  Mak, Henry K F ^a   Yau, Kelvin K W ^b   Chan, Bernard P L ^c  

^a YAN CHAI HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LETTER; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STATISTICS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 2942753972     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2321031974     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003; 228:303-308.
2. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa. 1. The problem of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43:543-549.
3. Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa. 11. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43:551-558.
4. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46:423-429.
5. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
6. Mak HK, Yau KK, Khong PL, et al. Hypodensity of >1/3 middle cerebral artery territory versus Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS): comparison of two methods of quantitative evaluation of early CT changes in hyperacute ischemic stroke in the community setting. Stroke 2003; 34:1194-1196.
7. Albaum MN, Hill LC, Murphy M, et al. Interobserver reliability of the chest radiograph in community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 1996; 110:343-350.