Two-object attentional interference depends on attentional set

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-134

  López, Maykel ^a   Rodríguez, Valia ^a   Valdés Sosa, Mitchell ^a  

^a CUBAN NEUROSCIENCE CENTER   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Attentional set; ERP; Motion; Object; Stimulus driven; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2942753840     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abrams R.A., Christ S.E. Motion onset captures attention. Psychol. Sci. 14(5):2003;427-432
2. Bacon W.F., Egeth H.E. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept. Psychophys. 55:1994;485-496
3. Blair R.C., Karniski W. An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;518-524
4. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:2002;201-215
5. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18:1992;1030-1044
6. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Wright J.H. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20:1994;317-329
7. Galan L., Biscay R., Rodriguez J.L. Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric of permutation tests. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 102:1997;240-247
8. Hillstrom A.P., Yantis S. Visual motion and attentional capture. Percept. Psychophys. 55:1994;399-411
9. Kastner S., Pinsk M., Desimone R., Ungerleider L. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron. 22:1999;751-761
10. Luck S.J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S.A., Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2 and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;24-42
11. Ludwig C.J., Gilchrist I.D. Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28:2002;902-912
12. Pashler H., Johnston J.C., Ruthruff E. Attention and performance. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:2001;629-651
13. Pinilla T., Cobo A., Torres K., Valdes-Sosa M. Attentional shifts between surfaces: effects on detection and early brain potentials. Vis. Res. 41:2001;1619-1630
14. Ress D., Backus B.T., Heeger D.J. Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;940-945
15. Reynolds J.H., Alborzian S., Stoner G.R. Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces. Vis. Res. 43:2003;59-66
16. Shulman G.L., Ollinger J.M., Akbudak E., Conturo T.E., Snyder A.Z., Petersen S.E., Corbetta M. Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects. J. Neurosci. 19:1999;9480-9496
17. Valdes-Sosa M., Cobo A., Pinilla T. Attention to object files defined by transparent motion. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26:2000;488-505
18. Valdes-Sosa M., Bobes M.A., Rodríguez V., Acosta Y., Pérez A., Iglesia J., Borrego M. The influence of scene organization on attention: psychophysics and electrophysiology. Kanwisher N., Duncan J. Attention and Performance XX: Functional Newimaging of Visual Cognition. Part 3, Chapter 16. 2003;Oxford University Press, Oxford
19. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16:1990;121-134