Research ethical challenges in cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural health research: The diversity of codes

Danish Medical Bulletin

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 117-120

  Aagaard Hansen, Jens ^a   Johansen, Maria Vang ^a   Riis, Povl ^a  

^a DANISH BILHARZIASIS LABORATORY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLITICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDIZATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;

EID: 2942752552     PISSN: 09078916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Riis P. The concept of scientific dishonesty, ethics, value systems and research. Chapter 1 in Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M. (eds). Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
2. Aagaard-Hansen J. A review of barriers and possibilities for cross-disciplinary health research - the example of Scandinavian, bilateral programmes in developing countries. Thesis. Master of Public Health. Gothenburg: Nordic School of Public Health, 2003.
3. Becher T, Trowler PR. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, 2001.
4. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries, London: Nuffield Foundation, 2002.
5. Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine. Oviedo: Council of Europe, 1997.
6. Council of Europe. Explanatory Report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1997.
7. Council of Europe. Draft additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Strasbourg: CDBI, 2002.
8. Council of Europe. Draft Explanatory Report to the Draft Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, on Biomedical Research. Strasbourg: CDBI, 2002.
9. World Medical Association. The Declaration of Helsinki. 5th revision. Edinburgh: WMA, 2000.
10. Riis P. Perspectives on the fifth version of the Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA 2000; 284: 3045-6.
11. UNESCO. The Universal Declaration of the Human Genome and Human Rights: from theory to practice. Paris: UNESCO, 1999.
12. WHO/CIOMS. International Guidelines on Bioethics. Geneva: CIOMS, 1999.
13. UNAIDS. Guidelines Document: Ethical Considerations in HIV Preventive Vaccine Research. UNAIDS, 2000.
14. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and the Convert of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of laws, regulations, and administrative provision of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medical products for human use. Offic J Europ Comm 2001: L 121/34.
15. US National Institute for Health. Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Involving Human Subjects at the National Institute of Health. Bethesda: NIH, 1995.
16. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries. NBAC: 2001.
17. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 2002.
18. Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association American Anthropological Association, 1998. http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ethcode.htm, date: 10th April 2003.
19. Commission to Review the AAA Statements on Ethics Final Report. American Anthropological Association. http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ethrpt.htm, date: 10th April 2003.