Area-based breeding zones to minimize maladaptation

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 695-704

  O'Neill, Gregory A ^a   Aitken, Sally N ^b  

^a RESEARCH BRANCH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; ECOSYSTEMS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MAPS;

BREEDING ZONES; ZONE-BOUNDARY PLACEMENT;

FORESTRY;

FORESTRY; PLANT BREEDING; TREE PLANTING;

PICEA; PICEA ENGELMANNII; PICEA GLAUCA;

EID: 2942752264     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x03-227     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Burdon, R.D. 1977. Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet. 26: 168-175.
2. Campbell, R.K. 1979. Genecology of Douglas-fir in a watershed in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology, 60: 1036-1050.
3. Campbell, R.K. 1986. Mapped genetic variation of Douglas-fir to guide seed transfer in southwest Oregon. Silvae Genet. 35: 85-96.
4. Campbell, R.K., and Sorensen, F.C. 1978. Effect of test environment on expression of clines and on delimitation of seed zones in Douglas-fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 51: 233-246.
5. Campbell, R.K., and Sugano, A.I. 1989. Seed zones and breeding zones for white pine in the Cascade range of Washington and Oregon. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-407. pp. 1-20.
6. Conkle, M.T., and Westfall, R.D. 1984. Evaluating breeding zones for ponderosa pine in California. In Progeny Testing, Proceedings of Service-Wide Genetics Workshop, Charleston, S.C., 5-9 December 1983. USDA For. Serv. Timber Manage. pp. 89-98.
7. Hamann, A., Koshy, M.P., Namkoong, G., and Ying, C.C. 2000. Genotype x environment interaction in Alnus rubra: developing seed zones and seed-transfer guidelines with spatial statistics and GIS. For. Ecol. Manage. 136: 107-119.
8. Isik, F. 2000. Provenance variation and provenance-site interaction in Pinus brutia Ten.: consequences of defining breeding zones. Silvae Genet. 49: 213-223.
9. Johnson, G.R. 1997. Site-to-site correlations and their implications in breeding zone size and optimum number of progeny test sites for coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 46: 280-285.
10. Lester, D.T., Ying, C.C., and Konishi, J.D. 1990. Genetic control and improvement of planting stock. In Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Edited by D.P. Lavender. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 180-191.
11. McKay, J.K., and Latta, R.G. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 285-291.
12. Monserud, R.A. 1990. An expert system for determining compatible seed-transfer locations. AI Appl. 4: 44-50.
13. Morgenstern, E.K. 1996. Geographic variation in forest trees: genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.
14. Parker, W.H. 1992. Focal point seed zones: site-specific seed zone delineation using geographic information systems. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 267-271.
15. Parker, W.H. 2000. Rates of change of adaptive variation in Picea mariana visualized by GIS using a differential systematic coefficient. New For. 20: 259-276.
16. Parker, W.H., and van Niejenhuis, A. 1996. Regression-based focal point seed zones for Picea mariana from northwestern Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 74: 1227-1235.
17. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1984. Veracity of short-term testing. In Progeny testing. Proceedings of the Service-Wide Genetics Workshop, Charleston, S.C., 5-9 December 1983. USDA For. Serv. Timber Manage. pp. 118-148.
18. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1985. Ecological genetics of Pinus contorta in the Wasatch and Uinta mountains of Utah. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 524-530.
19. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1990. Adaptability versus zone size: continuous zones for the Rocky Mountains (USA). Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of Western Forest Genetics Association and IUFRO Working Parties S2.02-06, 12, and 14 Douglas-fir, Contorta Pine, Sitka Spruce, and Abies Breeding and Genetic Resources, Olympia, Wash., 20-24 August 1990. Weyerhauser Co., Tacoma, Wash.
20. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1991. A model of genetic variation for Pinus ponderosa in the inland Northwest (USA): applications in gene resource management. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1491-1500.
21. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1992. Early selection in Pinus ponderosa: compromises between growth potential and growth rhythm in developing breeding strategies. For. Sci. 38: 661-677.
22. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1994a. Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the Intermountain West. Can. J. Bot. 72: 1197-1208.
23. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1994b. Genetic structure of western red cedar populations in the interior west. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 670-680.
24. Rehfeldt, G.E., and Wykoff, W.R. 1981. Periodicity of shoot elongation among populations of Pinus contorta from the northern Rocky Mountains. Ann. Bot. 48: 371-377.
25. Rehfeldt, G.E., Hoff, R.J., and Steinhoff, R.J. 1984. Geographic patterns of genetic variation in Pinus monticola. Bot. Gaz. (Boston), 145: 229-239.
26. Rehfeldt, G.E., Ying, C.C., Spittlehouse, D.L., and Hamilton, D.A., Jr. 1999. Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 375-407.
27. Roberds, J.H., and Namkoong, G. 1989. Population selection to maximize value in an environmental gradient. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 128-134.
28. Roberds, J.H., Hyun, J.O., Namkoong, G., and Rink, G. 1990. Height response functions for white ash provenances grown at different latitudes. Silvae Genet. 39: 121-129.
29. SAS Institute Inc. 1994. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
30. Sorensen, F.C. 1994. Genetic variation and seed transfer guidelines for ponderosa pine in central Oregon. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-472. pp. 1-24.
31. Stonecypher, R.W., Piesch, R.F., Helland, G.G., Chapman, J.G., and Reno, H.J. 1996. Results from genetic tests of selected parents of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) in an applied tree improvement program. For. Sci. 42: 1-35.
32. Sverdlov, L., Noble, J.F., and Nicolau, G. 1999. Cluster analysis (FASTCLUS procedure) to replicate platelet serotonin uptake rates as a biochemical marker of treatment effect for a new antidepressant drug. In Proceedings of PharmaSUG '99, New Orleans, La., 23-26 May 1999. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C. pp. 161-164.
33. Thompson, M. 1999. The science and art of market segmentation using PROC FASTCLUS. In 24th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Miami, Fla., 11-14 April 1999. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C. pp. 1567-1571.
34. Wartenberg, D. 1985. Canonical trend surface analysis: a method for describing geographic patterns. Syst. Zool. 34: 259-279.
35. Westfall, R.D., and Conkle, M.T. 1992. Allozyme markers in breeding zone designation. New For. 6: 279-309.
36. Zobel, B.J., and Talbert, J.T. 1984. Applied tree improvement. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.