The Ottawa ankle rules: Evaluation in a pediatric emergency setting in Mexico;Los criterios de Ottawa para tobillo: Valoración en un servicio de urgencias en México

Anales de Pediatria

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 454-458

  Cuello Garcia C ^a   Ruiz Flores, A ^a   Ramos Gomez L ^a   Medina Lopez M E ^a  

^a Hospital San Jose Tec de Monterrey   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Ankle injuries; Ottawa ankle rules; Pediatric injuries

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANKLE INJURY; ARTICLE; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EVALUATION; FOOT RADIOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEXICO; OTTAWA ANKLE RULES; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; RATING SCALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TELEPHONE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2942751906     PISSN: 16954033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13059649     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Vargish T, Clarke WR, Young RA, Jensen A. The ankle injury: Indications for the selective use of x-rays. Injury 1983;14: 507-12.
2. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:384-90.
3. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, McKnight RD, Cwinn AA, Cacciotti T, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26: 405-13.
4. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I., Reardon M, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA 1993;269:1127-32.
5. Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA 1994;271:827-32.
6. Chande VT. Decision rules for roentgenography of children with acute ankle injuries. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149: 255-8.
7. McBride KL. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital. Can Fam Physician 1997;43:459-65.
8. Plint AC, Bulloch B, Osmond MH, Stiell I, Dunlap H, Reed M, et al. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children with ankle injuries. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:1005-9.
9. Libetta C, Burke D, Brennan P, Yassa J. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children. J Accid Emerg Med 1999;16:342-4.
10. Yuen MC, Saunders F. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. The Ottawa ankle rules in children. Emerg Med J 2001;18:466-7.
11. Karpas A, Hennes H, Walsh-Kelly CM. Utilization of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurses in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:130-3.
12. Mohammed ZA, Baldwin GA. Reappraisal of use of X-rays in childhood ankle and midfoot injuries. Emergency Radiology 2002;9:88-92.
13. Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, Ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: Systematic review. BMJ 2003;326:417.
14. Mines BG, Sutcliffe T, Klassen TP. Agreement in the interpretation of extremity radiographs of injured children and adolescents. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:826-30.