MR and CT assessment for ischemic cardiac disease

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 659-675

  White, Richard D ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

CT; Ischemic heart disease; MR; Myocardial infarction; Myocardial ischemia

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVERSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCED MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEART ANEURYSM; HEART DISEASE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART RUPTURE; HEART VENTRICLE; HEART VENTRICLE ANEURYSM; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; PERICARDITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THROMBOSIS;

HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 2942750188     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20068     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. GUSTO II Angioplast Substudy Investigators. An international randomized trial of 1138 patients comparing primary coronary angioplasty vs. tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1621-1628.
2. Antoniucci D, Santoro GM, Bolognese L, et al. A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1234-1239.
3. DeWood MA, Notske RN, Berg RJ, et al. Medical and surgical management of early Q wave myocardial infarction. I: effects of surgical reperfusion on survival, recurrent myocardial infarction, sudden death, and functional class at 10 or more years of follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:65-77.
4. DiCarli MF, Asgarzadie F, Schelbert HR, et al. Quantitative relation between myocardial viability and improvement in heart failure symptoms after revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1995;92:3436-3444.
5. Sutton MSJ, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, et al. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction: the protective effects of captopril. Circulation 1994;89:68-75.
6. Pfeffer MA. Enhancing cardiac protection after myocardial infarction: rationale for newer clinical trials of angiotensin receptor blockers. Am Heart J 2000;139:S23-S28.
7. Hochman JS, Gersh BJ. Acute myocardial infarction: complications. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Williams and Wilkins; 2002. p 421-462.
8. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al. A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease: multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1882-1890.
9. Givertz MM, Colucci WS. New targets for heart failure therapy: endothelin, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress. Lancet 1998;352:34-38.
10. Ho KKL, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, et al. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:6A-13A.
11. Starling RC. The heart failure pandemic: changing patterns, costs, and treatment strategies. Cleve Clin J Med 1998;65:351-358.
12. Schvartzman PR, White RD. Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Williams and Wilkins; 2002. p 1213-1256.
13. Wagner S, Auffermann W, Buser P, et al. Functional description of the left ventricle in patients with volume overload, pressure overload, and myocardial disease using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Card Imaging 1991;5:87-97.
14. Simonetti O, Finn JP, White RD, et al. Black-blood T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 1996;199:49-57.
15. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A, et al. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:676-685.
16. Reichek N. MRI myocardial tagging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:609-616.
17. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, et al. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22:651-671.
18. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218:215-223.
19. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002.
20. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd R, et al. The prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:765-772.
21. Setser RM, Bexell DG, O'Donnell TP, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar in delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:434-441.
22. Rogers WJ, Kramer CM, Geskin G, et al. Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. Circulation 1999;99:744-750.
23. Kramer CM, Rogers WJ, Mankad S, et al. Contractile reserve and contrast uptake pattern by magnetic resonance imaging and functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1835-1840.
24. Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR, et al. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001;104:2838-2842.
25. Reeder SB, Du YP, Lima JAC, et al. Advanced cardiac MR imaging of ischemic heart disease. Radiographics 2001;21:1047-1074.
26. Warren WP, Lima JAC. Cardiac MRI: where are we? ACC Curr J Rev 2001;(Sept/Oct):35-41.
27. Nagel E, Lorenz C, Baer F, et al. Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: consensus panel report. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3:267-281.
28. Baer FM, Smolarz K, Jungehulsing M, et al. Feasibility if high-dose dipyridamole-magnetic resonance imaging for detection of coronary artery disease and comparison with coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:51-56.
29. Kramer CM, Malkowski MJ, Mankad S, et al. Magnetic resonance tagging and echocardiographic response to dobutamine and functional improvement after reperfused myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2002;143:1046-1051.
30. Wintersperger BJ, Penzkofer HV, Knez A, et al. Multislice MR perfusion imaging and regional myocardial function analysis: complimentary findings in chronic myocardial ischemia. Int J Card Imaging 1999;15:425-434.
31. Lauerma, K, Niemi P, Hanninen H, et al. Multimodality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability; combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG PET: initial experience. Radiology 2000;217:729-736.
32. Sensky PR, Jivan A, Hudson NM, et al. Coronary artery disease: combined stress MR imaging protocol: one-stop evaluation of myocardial perfusion and function. Radiology 2000;215:608-614.
33. Hartnell G, Cerel A, Kamalesh M, et al. Detection of myocardial ischemia: Value of combined myocardial perfusion and cineangiographic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1061-1067.
34. Sandstede JJW, Lipke C, Beer M, et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1737-1740.
35. Sawyer-Glover AM, Shellock FG. Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:92-106.
36. Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Farmer D, et al. Cardiac imaging with a high speed cine-CT scanner: preliminary results. Radiology 1984;152:579-582.
37. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, et al. Subsecond multislice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 1999;31:110-124.
38. Ohnesorge BM, Becker CR, Flohr, Reiser MF, editors. Multi-slice CT in cardiac imaging. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
39. Carrascosa PM, Capunay CM, Parodi JC, et al. General utilities of multislice tomography in the cardiac field. Herz 2003;28:44-51.
40. Saito K, Saito M, Komatu S, et al. Real-time four-dimensional imaging of the heart with multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 2002;23:e8-e11.
41. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051-2054.
42. Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Stillman AE, et al. Non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries: current and future role of role of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT). Radiology 2004 (in press).
43. Forrester JS, Diamond G, Parmeley WW, et al. Early increase in left ventricular compliance after myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 1972;51:598-603.
44. Ross J, Jr. Myocardial perfusion-contraction matching: implications for coronary heart disease and hibernation. Circulation 1991;83:1076-1083.
45. Califf RM, Bengston JR. Cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1724-1730.
46. Shah PK, Maddahi J, Staniloff HM, et al. Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:387-393.
47. Widimsky P, Gregor P, Cervenka V, et al. Severe diffuse hypokinesis of the remote myocardium: the main cause of cardiogenic shock? An echocardiographic study of 75 patients with extremely large myocardial infarctions. Cor Vasa 1988;30:27-34.
48. Francis GS. Pathophysiology of the heart failure clinical syndrome. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Williams and Wilkins; 2002. p 1785-1806.
49. Dulce MC, Mostbeck GH, Friese KK, et al. Quantitation of the left ventricular volumes and function with cine MRI: comparison of geometric models and three-dimensional data. Radiology 1993;188:371-376.
50. Auffermann W, Wagner S, Holt WW, et al. Noninvasive determination of left ventricular output and wall stress in volume overload and in myocardial disease by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1991;121:1750-1758.
51. Halliburton SS, Petersilka M, Schvartzman PR, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003;19:73-83.
52. Juergens KW, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1545-1550.
53. Mahnken AH, Spuntrup E, Wildberger JE, et al. Quantification of cardiac function with multislice spiral CT using retrospective EKG-gating: comparison with MRI. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr Fortschr Rontgenstr 2003;175:83-88. [Ger]
54. Pattynama PMT, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EO, et al. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MRI imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology 1993;187:261-268.
55. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, et al. Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle. Am Heart J 1990;119:1367-1373.
56. Dirksen MS, Bax JJ, de Roos A, et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1157-1160.
57. Konermann M, Sanner BM, Horstmann E, et al. Changes of the left ventricle after myocardial infarction: estimation with cine magnetic resonance imaging during the first six months. Clin Cardiol 1997;20:201-212.
58. Pflugfelder PW, Sechtem UP, White RD, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial function by rapid cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:523-529.
59. Baer FM, Smolarz K, Jungehulsing M, et al. Chronic myocardial infarction: assessment of morphology, function, and perfusion by gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile-SPECT. Am Heart J 1992;123:636-645.
60. Dendale PAC, Franken PR, Waldman G-J, et al. Low-dosage dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging as an alternative to echocardiography in the detection of viable myocardium after acute infarction. Am Heart J 1995;130:134-140,
61. Kramer CM, Malkowski MJ, Mankad S, et al. Magnetic resonance tagging and echocardiographic response to dobutamine and functional improvement after reperfused myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2002;143:1046-1051.
62. van der Wall EE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995;92:2723-2739.
63. Buck T, Hunold P, Wentz KU, et al. Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1997;96:4286-4297.
64. Duvernoy O, Wikstrom G, Mannting F, et al. Pre- and post-operative CT and MR in pseudoaneurysms of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:401-409.
65. Kahn J, Fisher MR. MRI of cardiac pseudoaneurysm and other complications of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Imaging 1991;9:159-164.
66. Sechtem U, Theissen P, Heindel W, et al. Diagnosis of left ventricular thrombi by magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with angiocardiography, computed tomography, and echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:1195-1199.
67. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Cassidy MM, et al. Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1988;167:425-430.
68. Frank H, Globits S. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of myocardial and pericardial disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:617-626.
69. Rienmuller R. 25 years of cardiac CT imaging; past, present, and future. Herz 2003;28:99-105.
70. Alderman EL, Fisher LD, Litwin P, et al. Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circulation 1983;68:785-795.
71. Bonow RO. Identification of viable myocardium. Circulation 1996;94:2674-2680.
72. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361:374-379.
73. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105:162-167.
74. Rehwald WG, Fieno DS, Chen E-L, et al. Myocardial magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent concentrations after reversible and irreversible ischemic injury. Circulation 2002;105:224-229.
75. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen E-L, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance Imaging of myocardium at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1985-1991.
76. Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon. Circulation 2002;105:656-662.
77. Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;98:1006-1014.
78. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Anno H, et al. Relationship between thrombolytic therapy and perfusion defect detected by Gd-DTPA-enhanced fast magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3:237-245.
79. Lima JAC, Judd RM, Bazille A, et al. Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI: potential mechanisms. Circulation 1995;92:1117-1125.
80. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.
81. Schvartzman PR, Srichai MB, Grimm RA, et al. Non-stress delayed-enhancement MRI of the myocardium predicts recovery of function after revascularization for chronic ischemic heat disease. Am Heart J 2003;146:535-541.
82. Mochizuki T, Murase K, Higashino H, et al. Demonstration of acute myocardial infarction by subsecond spiral computed tomography: early defect and delayed enhancement. Circulation 1999;99:2058-2059.
83. Klow NE, Smith HJ, Gullestad L, et al. Outcome of bypass surgery in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: predictive value of MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1997;38:76-82.
84. Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Nikoloau K, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive coronary angiography and plaque imaging: current and potential future concepts. Circulation 2002;106:2026-2034.
85. van Ooijen PMA, Dorgelo J, Oudkerk M. Noninvasive coronary imaging: CT versus MR. Herz 2003;28:143-149.
86. Nieman K, van Geuns R-JM, Wielopolski P, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging in the new millennium: a comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2002;3:77-84.
87. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001;103:2535-2538.
88. Schroeder S, Kopp A, Baumbach A, et al. Non-invasive characterization of coronary lesion morphology by multi-slice computed tomography: a promising new technology for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. Heart 2001;85:576-577.
89. Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Stillman AE, et al. Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and remodeling in mildly stenotic coronary segments: comparison of 16-slice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis 2003;14:459-462.
90. White RD, Setser RM. Integrated approach to evaluating coronary artery disease and ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:49L-55L.
91. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-542.
92. Setser RM, O'Donnell TP, Smedira NG, et al. Co-registered MRI myocardial viability maps and MSCT coronary angiogram displays can improve surgical revascularization planning. Radiology 2004 (in press).
93. White RD, Pflugfelder PW, Lipton MJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: evaluation of patency with cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1271-1274.
94. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, et al. Detection of vein graft disease using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 2002;105:328-333.
95. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema W, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation 2003;107:1502-1508.
96. Higgins CB. Cardiac imaging. Radiology 2000;217:4-10.
97. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Raaijmakers R, et al. Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography. Herz 2003;28:136-142.
98. Storto ML, Marano R, Maddestra N, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for in-stent restenosis. Circulation 2002;105:2005.
99. Maintz D, Juergens K-W, Wichter T, et al. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 2003;13:830-835.
100. Kramer CM, Magovem JA, Rogers WJ, et al. Reverse remodeling and improved regional function after repair of left ventricular aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:700-706.