Increasing the accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk: Results from a randomized trial with Cancer Information Service callers

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 64-73

  Davis, Sharon ^a   Stewart, Susan ^a   Bloom, Joan ^b  

^a NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer prevention and control; Gail model; Health education; Risk notification; Telephone information services

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2942737215     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.043     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. American Cancer Society Cancer facts and figures 2003. 2003;American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
2. Sattin R.W., Rubin G.L., Webster L.A., Huezo C.M., Wingo P.A., Ory H.W., et al. Family history and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 253:1985;1908-1913
3. Anderson D.E., Badzioch M.D. Combined effect of family history and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk. Cancer. 63:1989;349-353
4. Schatzkin A.S., Palmer J.R., Rosenberg L., Helmrich S.P., Miller D.R., Kaufman D.W., et al. Risk factors for breast cancer in Black women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 78:1987;213-217
5. Wanebo H.J. Risk factors in breast cancer. V. Med. 1988 (Apr);163-166
6. Gail M., Brinton L., Byar D., Corle D., Green S., Schairer C., et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81:1989;1879-1886
7. Costantino J.P., Gail M.H., Pee D., et al. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91:1999;1541-1548
8. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool: http://bcra.nci.nih.gov/brc.
9. Bunker J.P., Houghton J., Baum M. Putting the risk of breast cancer in perspective. BMJ. 317:1998;1307-1309
10. Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M., Black W.C., Welch G. Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters. Med. Decis. Making. 19:1999;221-229
11. Costanza M.E., Zapka J.G., Harris D.R., Hosmer D., Barth R., Greene H.L., et al. Impact of a physician intervention program to increase breast cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1(7):1992;581-589
12. Evans D.G., Burnell L.D., Hopwood P., Howell A. Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 67:1993;612-614
13. Smith B.L., Gadd M.A., Lawler C., MacDonald D.J., Grudberg S.C., Chi F.S., et al. Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: correlation with age and family history of breast cancer. Surgery. 120:1996;297-303
14. National Cancer Institute Questions and answers about screening mammograms. Cancer Facts. vol. 5.28:2000;National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
15. McCaul K.D., Tulloch H.E. Cancer screening decisions. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 25:1999;52-58
16. Vernon S.W. Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behavior: a review. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 25:1999;101-118
17. Lerman C., Schwartz M. Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 28:1993;145-155
18. Houts P.S., Wojtkowiak S.L., Simmonds M.A., Weinberg G.B., Heitjan D.F. Using a state cancer registry to increase screening behaviors of sisters and daughters of breast cancer patients. Am. J. Public Health. 81(3):1991;386-388
19. Bowen D., McTiernan A., Burke W., Powers D., Pruski J., Durfy S., et al. Participation in breast cancer risk counseling among women with a family history. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 8:1999;581-585
20. Lerman C., Rimer B.K., Engstrom P.F. Cancer risk notification: psychosocial and ethical implications. J. Clin. Oncol. 7:1991;1275-1282
21. Lerman C., Lustbader E., Rimer B., Daly M., Miller S., Sands C., et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87:1995;286-292
22. Lipkus I.M., Klein W.M., Rimer B.K. Communicating breast cancer risks to women using different formats. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 10:2001;895-898
23. Bastani R., Maxwell A.E., Bradford C., Das I.P., Yan K.X. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev. Med. 29(5):1999;355-364
24. Kadison P., Pelletier E.M., Mounib E.L., Oppedisano P., Poteat H.T. Improved screening for breast cancer associated with a telephone-based risk assessment. Prev. Med. 27(3):1998;493-501
25. Thomsen C.A., Ter Maat J. Evaluating the cancer information service: a model for health communications: Part 1. J. Health Commun. 3:1998;1-13. (suppl.)
26. Rakowski W., Fulton J.P., Feldman J.P. Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol. 12:1993;209-214
27. Bloom J.R., Stewart S.L., Lee M. Risk notification for women at high risk for breast cancer. Poster presented at the California Breast Cancer Research Symposium, September 12-14 2003, San Diego, California:2003
28. Hiatt R., Bloom J.R. Cancer screening tests among blacks: congruence between self-report and medical record audits. 1990;American Public Health Association, New York City
29. Lerman C., Trock B., Rimer B. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol. 10(4):1991;259-267
30. Perkins C.I., Morris C.R., Wright W.E. Cancer incidence and mortality in California by race/ethnicity, 1988-1993. 1996;California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, Sacramento, CA
31. Lipkus I.M., Kuchibhatla M., McBride C.M., Pollak K.I., Siegler I.C., Rimer B.K. Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 9:2000;973-975
32. McCaul K.D., O'Donnell S.M. Naïve beliefs about breast cancer risk. Women's Health, Res. Gend. Behav. Policy. 4(1):1998;93-101
33. Kagawa-Singer M. Issues affecting Asian American and Pacific American women. Hassey-Dow K. Contemporary issues in breast cancer. 1996;Jones and Bartlett, Boston
34. California Cancer Facts and Figures 2001. 2001;American Cancer Society, California Division, Oakland, CA
35. Lipkus I.M., Biradavolu M., Fenn K., Keller P.N., Rimer B.K. Informing women about their breast cancer risks: truth and consequences. Health Commun. 13(2):2001;205-226
36. Ward J.A.D., Baum S., Ter Maat J., Thomsen C.A., Maibach E.W. The value and impact of the Cancer Information Service telephone service: Part 4. J. Health Commun. 3:1998;50-70. (Suppl.)
37. Aiken L.S., West S.G., Woodward C.K., Reno R.R., Reynolds K.D. Increasing screening mammography in asymptomatic women: evaluation of a second generation, theory-based program. Health Psychol. 13:1994;526-538
38. King E.S., Rimer B.K., Trock B., Balshem A., Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports? Am. J. Public Health. 80:1990;1386-1388
39. Marcus A.C., Heimendinger J., Wolfe P., Fairclough D., Rimer B.K., Morra M., et al. A randomized trial of a brief intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake: a replication study among callers to the CIS. Prev. Med. 33:2001;104-216